Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Jermichael Finley for Chris Johnson
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MLB" data-source="post: 470086" data-attributes="member: 6585"><p>I'm more concerned with his "mouth" than his "drops." I'm also wondering if he is (or could become) a "cancer in the locker room."</p><p></p><p>You're right to point out that he's only 24.</p><p></p><p>He certainly has the body and speed (and I always liked him in the past), but a few of his past public statements, as well as that remark by his agent (concerning Rodgers) might be "red flags." Or, maybe not. Or, maybe he just needs a change of scenery.</p><p></p><p>But...let's get back to the most important thing: our Packers-Browns proposal...</p><p></p><p>In addition to Jennings, Newhouse, and Finley, we have to also give our 1st next year "just to get them talking"?</p><p></p><p>Sure, Joe Thomas is a "stud", but the best at his position? Maybe, but how is that determined, or quantified? And, he is just one player...we'd be giving up three (and only Newhouse is average).</p><p></p><p>IMHO, a healthy Jennings might be a stud WR for five years for the Browns (like Gary Collins and Paul Warfield in Browns' past), and a healthy Finley might become the second-best TE in Browns' history. I only suggest trading both because we're so deep at those positions (especially at WR), and because we could really use Thomas.</p><p></p><p>If you're fine with our first-rounder next year ... plus Jennings ... plus Finley ... plus Newhouse ... for just Joe Thomas, then I think you are under-valuing GJ and JF.</p><p></p><p>Me? I'd do it if we could at least get a high-round pick back from the Browns. Since you made some good points above, I guess I'd settle for a 2nd or a 3rd. I mean, a change of scenery, and Jennings and Finley--with good health and a decent QB--could very well prove to both be "studs" playing for the Browns.</p><p></p><p>And who knows regarding future health? Thomas might get banged up playing for us. Then they'll run both of us out of this forum on a rail.</p><p></p><p>Anyway...</p><p></p><p>OK. In your opinion, what would be the absolute MINIMUM (above scenario) Cleveland would demand for Joe Thomas?</p><p></p><p>(And be realistic, or we'll never get TT to do the deal; you know he reads these threads!)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MLB, post: 470086, member: 6585"] I'm more concerned with his "mouth" than his "drops." I'm also wondering if he is (or could become) a "cancer in the locker room." You're right to point out that he's only 24. He certainly has the body and speed (and I always liked him in the past), but a few of his past public statements, as well as that remark by his agent (concerning Rodgers) might be "red flags." Or, maybe not. Or, maybe he just needs a change of scenery. But...let's get back to the most important thing: our Packers-Browns proposal... In addition to Jennings, Newhouse, and Finley, we have to also give our 1st next year "just to get them talking"? Sure, Joe Thomas is a "stud", but the best at his position? Maybe, but how is that determined, or quantified? And, he is just one player...we'd be giving up three (and only Newhouse is average). IMHO, a healthy Jennings might be a stud WR for five years for the Browns (like Gary Collins and Paul Warfield in Browns' past), and a healthy Finley might become the second-best TE in Browns' history. I only suggest trading both because we're so deep at those positions (especially at WR), and because we could really use Thomas. If you're fine with our first-rounder next year ... plus Jennings ... plus Finley ... plus Newhouse ... for just Joe Thomas, then I think you are under-valuing GJ and JF. Me? I'd do it if we could at least get a high-round pick back from the Browns. Since you made some good points above, I guess I'd settle for a 2nd or a 3rd. I mean, a change of scenery, and Jennings and Finley--with good health and a decent QB--could very well prove to both be "studs" playing for the Browns. And who knows regarding future health? Thomas might get banged up playing for us. Then they'll run both of us out of this forum on a rail. Anyway... OK. In your opinion, what would be the absolute MINIMUM (above scenario) Cleveland would demand for Joe Thomas? (And be realistic, or we'll never get TT to do the deal; you know he reads these threads!) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
58 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: tynimiller
Yesterday at 10:57 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 3:04 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Movies and TV shows Thread
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 2:00 PM
Movies and Entertainment
M
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Magooch
Yesterday at 11:43 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Jermichael Finley for Chris Johnson
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
