Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="jaybadger82" data-source="post: 461399" data-attributes="member: 6211">"Security" is a terrible euphemism for jumping at guaranteed money in a profession where careers can end in a single play. Jennings jumped at a similar offer a few years ago and it represented a great value to the Packers.  Based on production, he was underpaid.  Why be so accommodating this time around?  -I don't hold this against him.  In free agency, Jennings would probably have a number of suitors and his value would be set by the highest bidder.  That's not payment for past performance, that's market value. We're largely in agreement.  Except, in a league where the deck is so clearly stacked against players, I don't feel a need to take such a condescending and management-friendly tone in describing rational business decision-making by an individual player. The Packers will probably steer clear of Jennings because large contracts present large risks.  I don't hold this against them, either. It will suck to see him in another uni, though.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 119 (members: 0, guests: 119)