Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
James jones instead of Jennings?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tynimiller" data-source="post: 471162" data-attributes="member: 6578"><p><img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/smile.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-shortname=":)" /> Don't worry trust me I haven't forgotten about those positions you stated...but (disclaimer the following is my opinion)...</p><p> </p><p>-MLBs- If we keep Hawk around we're fine with DJ Smith and Bishop set to return next season just fine we've got 3 viable starters and our back ups already have proven themselves to be capable....worth drafting yes, worrying about it high in the draft....nah</p><p> </p><p>-LT-This is definitely a position where if TT sees a LT just fall to him I think you take him, no matter how you feel Newhouse or Sherrod are if one drops to you that is a stud get him...if not TT will have to listen to his gut on his beliefs of the two listed or how much growth/potential he sees in Datko.</p><p> </p><p>-Safety- Call me crazy but I'm pretty content. I love what Jennings and McMillian have shown...not to mention Burnett is loved by the coaches as well and I foresee being very solid for years to come. That Sean Richardson out of Vandy caught me eye with his raw ability in the pre-season as well. Polish that guy up and we all of a sudden have depth.....BUT WOODSON, don't forget Woodson. If Hayward keeps elevating his game and House/Shields stay healthy and stick around (I know contract may not happen) Woodson's playing at the S position could begin to happen more and more than it already is.</p><p> </p><p>So really the above 3 I don't place in high priority right now...the following two while a QB is not high priority a backup is needed.</p><p> </p><p>-QB-I haven't given up on Harrell but I'd love to see TT draft another or bring in a cheap FA with some young legs to give us a true battle. Coleman is smart and I like him but raw and we all knew he had no chance.</p><p> </p><p>-Line-This one could slide up into the LT territory for me. If TT and staff feel Worthy could potentially play big enough to rest Raji from time to time we may not see him draft one atleast not high...but to me DT and LT are the same in that if stud drop take him...but many countless DT's and LT's have been undrafted or late round guys that developed.</p><p> </p><p>Just quick thoughts.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tynimiller, post: 471162, member: 6578"] :) Don't worry trust me I haven't forgotten about those positions you stated...but (disclaimer the following is my opinion)... -MLBs- If we keep Hawk around we're fine with DJ Smith and Bishop set to return next season just fine we've got 3 viable starters and our back ups already have proven themselves to be capable....worth drafting yes, worrying about it high in the draft....nah -LT-This is definitely a position where if TT sees a LT just fall to him I think you take him, no matter how you feel Newhouse or Sherrod are if one drops to you that is a stud get him...if not TT will have to listen to his gut on his beliefs of the two listed or how much growth/potential he sees in Datko. -Safety- Call me crazy but I'm pretty content. I love what Jennings and McMillian have shown...not to mention Burnett is loved by the coaches as well and I foresee being very solid for years to come. That Sean Richardson out of Vandy caught me eye with his raw ability in the pre-season as well. Polish that guy up and we all of a sudden have depth.....BUT WOODSON, don't forget Woodson. If Hayward keeps elevating his game and House/Shields stay healthy and stick around (I know contract may not happen) Woodson's playing at the S position could begin to happen more and more than it already is. So really the above 3 I don't place in high priority right now...the following two while a QB is not high priority a backup is needed. -QB-I haven't given up on Harrell but I'd love to see TT draft another or bring in a cheap FA with some young legs to give us a true battle. Coleman is smart and I like him but raw and we all knew he had no chance. -Line-This one could slide up into the LT territory for me. If TT and staff feel Worthy could potentially play big enough to rest Raji from time to time we may not see him draft one atleast not high...but to me DT and LT are the same in that if stud drop take him...but many countless DT's and LT's have been undrafted or late round guys that developed. Just quick thoughts. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
The Crew - 2026
Latest: weeds
39 minutes ago
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 11:12 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: tynimiller
Yesterday at 10:57 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 3:04 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Movies and TV shows Thread
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 2:00 PM
Movies and Entertainment
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
James jones instead of Jennings?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
