Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 802084" data-attributes="member: 7261"><p>I'm not going to try and find my post at the time of the trade, but I did some calculating of what the Packers would have had to offer the Raiders to "beat the Bears" offer, basing it off of the draft value trade chart that many use.  At that time, it would have been 3 first rounders for the Packers to come close.  Not even going to rehash the $$ cost of trying to carry both Mack and Rodgers.  Sure, Mack is doing some great things in Chicago and I would have loved to have had him, but he doesn't improve our offense this year and hinders the amount of money the Packers have to spend on improving that offense, as well as the defense.  I also think Chicago had a better defense than the Packers when they acquired Mack, so his impact there has been even greater due to the talent around him.  One guy on defense isn't going to be a big enough difference maker to justify that kind of draft capital or money, in my opinion.</p></blockquote><p></p>

No members online now.

Total: 1,009 (members: 0, guests: 1,009)