Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
NFL Discussions
It's been kind of quiet for a few days.......
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1066307" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>No it’s not that, you can manipulate it alright. Looking forward we know 2027 Caleb will be expecting a large contract IF he is worthy. Which is likely. Chicago is cap strapped which will push this out until 2027 and beyond UNLESS you release the equivalent of other players. So there’s a balance sheet accounting for resources lost and gained here.</p><p>It’s not impossible, but imo there’s only a handful of teams that have BOTH the capacity in capital and ideal conditions to make this move. I honestly don’t see Chicago as having either, much less both.</p><p></p><p>A couple teams that would fall into both categories are the Commanders or Chargers. There’s maybe several others. The only one I see in the North would be The Packers but it would be maxing out our budget and limiting resigning several key players next season. Frankly, I think the Packers are ready to go all the way without Parsons and I mean that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 1066307, member: 10086"] No it’s not that, you can manipulate it alright. Looking forward we know 2027 Caleb will be expecting a large contract IF he is worthy. Which is likely. Chicago is cap strapped which will push this out until 2027 and beyond UNLESS you release the equivalent of other players. So there’s a balance sheet accounting for resources lost and gained here. It’s not impossible, but imo there’s only a handful of teams that have BOTH the capacity in capital and ideal conditions to make this move. I honestly don’t see Chicago as having either, much less both. A couple teams that would fall into both categories are the Commanders or Chargers. There’s maybe several others. The only one I see in the North would be The Packers but it would be maxing out our budget and limiting resigning several key players next season. Frankly, I think the Packers are ready to go all the way without Parsons and I mean that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
57 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Cornelius Weems
Today at 12:05 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 10:29 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 7:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: weeds
Yesterday at 6:52 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
NFL Discussions
It's been kind of quiet for a few days.......
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top