Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Aaron Rodgers Discusson
It’s Time!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 911633" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>People are going to get tired of this. But in my research several years ago (2014?) The average winning SB team had a #7 range scoring Defense (it was actually like #6.75) and #8 ranked scoring Offense (somewhere in the #8.3 range) You can obviously get there inverting those. But the average SB winning team ranked #15 in scoring when adding the 2 O+D together, but slightly leaning Defence. I’d add that the farther you vary in adding to that total ranking #15 scoring. the less probability you have of winning a SB and vice versa.</p><p>What was odd was I made a personal bet In 2014 that GB would need to improve their Defence to</p><p>#11-12 scoring to increase their odds. The year Clay converted to ILB we surged all the way down to #13 overall scoring D over the last 3-4 weeks regular season. We missed it by 1 and we lost in OT to Seattle by a hair to advance. Our D was just not quite there. Seattle lost that SB on the last play at the goal line INT to NE.</p><p></p><p>The numbers don’t lie and that was 50 years worth of test sample from NFL SB wining teams. Well rounded teams Win Championships. However if we want to split hairs we can say D is very slightly more important if you had to choose.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 911633, member: 10086"] People are going to get tired of this. But in my research several years ago (2014?) The average winning SB team had a #7 range scoring Defense (it was actually like #6.75) and #8 ranked scoring Offense (somewhere in the #8.3 range) You can obviously get there inverting those. But the average SB winning team ranked #15 in scoring when adding the 2 O+D together, but slightly leaning Defence. I’d add that the farther you vary in adding to that total ranking #15 scoring. the less probability you have of winning a SB and vice versa. What was odd was I made a personal bet In 2014 that GB would need to improve their Defence to #11-12 scoring to increase their odds. The year Clay converted to ILB we surged all the way down to #13 overall scoring D over the last 3-4 weeks regular season. We missed it by 1 and we lost in OT to Seattle by a hair to advance. Our D was just not quite there. Seattle lost that SB on the last play at the goal line INT to NE. The numbers don’t lie and that was 50 years worth of test sample from NFL SB wining teams. Well rounded teams Win Championships. However if we want to split hairs we can say D is very slightly more important if you had to choose. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Staff online
Poppa San
* Team Owner *
Members online
tynimiller
Team Ronny
Poppa San
Latest posts
Final Annoying Mock/Prediction
Latest: Poppa San
19 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Prospects you are A LOT higher on than consensus…
Latest: Thirteen Below
21 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Free Agency Thread
Latest: Sanguine camper
Today at 5:26 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Backed Into A Corner?
Latest: Pkrjones
Today at 5:21 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Rodgers for Vice President?
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 3:47 PM
Aaron Rodgers Discusson
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Aaron Rodgers Discusson
It’s Time!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top