Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 999937" data-attributes="member: 7261">Looks like you missed the very first post about the subject, I have put it below for you to read.  How you interpret the first half of that post might say something about how you process anything Rodgers.  I get a kick out of the whole Rodgers debate.  Most Packer fans have acknowledged how great Rodgers was as a Packer, but if they dare point out some flaws in his game or character, suddenly they are a "Rodgers Basher", to a few people.Rodgers will be a first ballot HOF'er, he had an awesome career in Green Bay.  During his time in GB, he may have done more for the Packers than any single player has.  However, he's human, he has flaws, he makes mistakes.  Many fans got tired of his schtick, as well as the cost to keep him around and as hard as it is for some to hear, I think the FO did too.  I understand those that want to remain loyal to him and would have been just fine with him playing in GB for the rest of his career.  However, what I don't understand is the sensitivity some have to any level of Rodgers criticism.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 955 (members: 0, guests: 955)