Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 999511">You need to consider Kelce's impact on the stats of the wide receivers though. Him being targeted a total of 152 times results in the WRs getting significantly less thrown to.It's absolutely fine to mention Rodgers has lost mobility over the course of his career. It would be insane to suggest otherwise. What's the point of bringing it up when talking about Kelce being a superior tight end over everyone on the Packers' roster though?Well, I never mentioned anything about Rodgers' lack of mobility not being a factor.That's a pretty sad statement but perfectly sums up the way a lot of posters interact around here. For some strange reason posters that dare to not approve every single move of the team's front office are deemed to be less of a fan because of it.</blockquote>

Total: 1,216 (members: 2, guests: 1,214)