Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 996946" data-attributes="member: 7261">Agreed.  Also, the fact that the Jets took on the $58.3 M was just as big, if not bigger than the picks, IMO.  Had the Jets backed out and went a different direction, what kind of deal do the Packers get and how long do they wait?  Some suggested to just sit Rodgers and reject any low ball offers.  Besides the drama that would have created, suddenly your cap is a disaster, you are paying massive amounts of money to a guy that isn't playing and you lose a roster spot, just to make a point?  That would have set the Packers back more than just outright releasing Rodgers would have.Would have loved more draft capital, but that ship sailed last year.  The Packers can now get on with LAR (Life After Rodgers) and after this season, be financially (cap wise) done with the him.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 952 (members: 0, guests: 952)