Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 996730" data-attributes="member: 10086">True that. Exactly what I was thinking.#13 is an area where there’s a smaller, but still significant chance (33%) someone gets overlooked that really should’ve been single digits.There’s also a possibility that we are looking at good sized group of players at #13  that we have graded in that #15-20 overall range and aren’t overly excited there. My other thought there is doing as small of a tradeback as possible where we get a slight return on our risk investment for waiting. A really good example would be the Steelers at #17 and using their #80 overall to get there. Even if we throw them a 6th or 7th Rounder, that’s a trade I might make.The Packers would be picking similar to this:#17#42, #45#78, #80#116#149#2087th, 7th, 7th (7th traded)Btw.  I saw on one CBS Mock they had Lucas Van Ness going at #6 overall to the Lions.Is that possible? I was thinking he was more in the mid teens at best.</blockquote>

Total: 1,415 (members: 1, guests: 1,414)