Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 994917" data-attributes="member: 10086">I think people in the media are misinterpreting that and it’s getting distorted.  From what I heard Brian said nothing about lowering value. But rather that it could be done without a #13.  He never at anytime eluded to lowering his combined value for This trade. He’s catching the Jets in their own trap. Both sides want that #13 and The Packers brass are just saying keep it if that’s your hangup, but we want comparable draft value.A 42,43 gets close to #13 value but loses the 5th year option. It’s like a 17-18th overall, but slightly lower for losing a 5th year. So Call it #20 overall. By us offering them their #13, we have done the give and NY has done the take.  Now where are we being reciprocated in the draft next season for allowing all this freedom of draft choices. Backing up to #20 overall? That like losing a mid 3rd Rounder in value just like that.My final guess. I’m sure The Packers will bend a little and they’ve eluded to that. The Packers brass won’t let that 3rd Rounder get taken AND gift NY another 2nd. I believe our current floor is somewhere in that 42,43 or 42,74 area, which could happen because of the ties we have to NY. Both our Coaches and GM’s are longtime friends.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 1,053 (members: 0, guests: 1,053)