Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 993621" data-attributes="member: 10086">I’m not portraying I know the exact reasons for us holding out.  However one thought that came to mind is that if the draft selections offered are minimal? GB might be resolved to eating more of Rodgers money and trading him for more draft capital later instead of taking peanuts now.If GB gets stuck with more money, that = the partner Tradee team NOT getting stuck with nearly as much $$ and that means likely signing Rodgers to a more modest yearly for a partner in the near future. Then in a scenario where a good team has a QB go down? That wounded team will be a major candidate to trade a future Day 1 or equivalent. No it’s not the perfect scenario, but it’s 1 sorta worst case option.The other is Rodgers gets fed up and retires. Ok. So we wash his $$ in 2023 and lose that Jets 3rd Rounder or whatnot?  I’m ok with that it’s peanuts kinda capital and I’m not scared at all. We’re taking a step back in 2023 like it or not and if we’re going to gamble we’ve got 1 year on our side and his total guaranteed next season is less than this one.</blockquote>

Total: 994 (members: 2, guests: 992)