Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 993309">The problem was that Murphy announced it publicly that the Packers don't want Rodgers back before a deal with the Jets was in place.Gutekunst actually indicated that they want Rodgers back in his season ending press conference. It seems he was the one lying.I don't agree the offense is suspect at every position. They're set at running back <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/wink.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)" data-shortname=";)" />The Packers would have to pay Rodgers $60 million to sit on the bench. They don't hold all the cards.First of all I highly doubt the Jets are interested in waiting until after June 1 to trade for Rodgers. In addition, while the Packers would save $24.5 million of cap space for the 2023 season that amount would result in dead money counting against their cap in '24. Overall, they don't save a cent by making the move later.Rasul Douglas and Aaron Jones definitely disagree with your take.The Raiders would take an additional cap hit of $16.66 million for this season by trading Adams. Not gonna happen.Actually Adams and Rodgers would only count a combined $22.6 million towards the Jets' cap in 2023.The Jets hiring Hackett as an offensive coordinator wasn't any evidence for the Packers wanting to move on from Rodgers. Otherwise he would have been a Broncos last year.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 758 (members: 0, guests: 758)