Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1006020" data-attributes="member: 10086">That’s probably true. The age thing never wears well in GB. Added to that is Aaron very intentionally socked it to our Team by demanding league high instead of a 73% of market price type deal (See Jets restructure)  It’s a double whammy and his whining ultimately became a fast ball for strike 3.I mentioned several years ago that Rodgers should’ve taken a Brady type yearly but ask for longer term and higher guarantee (because that’s all that matters as we just found out with NY) I was answered by a certain poster (not you) that Brady never took any team friendly deals. Some others in here were defensive and said “why should he take a paycut would you?” type sentiment, likely not thinking through the total calculated risk/reward. Actually I would take a yearly pay decrease if the guaranteed was proper or I wouldn’t have mentioned it in the first place.</blockquote>

Total: 1,266 (members: 2, guests: 1,264)