Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
2013 Draft Archive
Is Ted interested in this guy?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DevilDon" data-source="post: 495732" data-attributes="member: 2057"><p>Really HRE? The fact that MM said they were "looking" at Bulaga now suggests they're considering it? You might also want to point out that they are probably looking at every single possibility. Either way, my point was that does not put Newhouse or Sherrod in threat of not making the roster.</p><p> </p><p></p><p>Well there ya go genius. I was pointing out that it was unlikely he be moved to LT. What part is difficult for you to understand?</p><p> </p><p></p><p>I got that buddy, but at what point do you think that the upper echelons of the depth chart are in danger of losing jobs? If anybody, might it be a Datko or Barclay? You don't have to be a genius to figure that if a new starter is inherent or crowned the bottom of the depth chart is in peril, not the top.</p><p> </p><p></p><p>How was Barclay not expected to be an NFL player? Clearly TT thought he was. I would argue Newhouse is average but he does not suck. Your emotions are all over your sleeve HRE. He was a late round draft pick who is handling one of the premier positions in the NFL against the premier defensive players in the league. He's done OK and to me that spells success for a guy who was drafted so late. He's a stop gap and was due to be replaced but injuries negated that. I give him props for doing what he has so far.</p><p> </p><p></p><p>You should be able to read just a tiny bit between the lines. I didn't mean to imply Q could never be a starter, what I meant was that he wouldn't be expected to start this season. Sorry if you were confused about that. As a Packer fan who sees many UDFAs make the team and some start I would have thought you'd know I consider every pick to be a potential starter at some point. I didn't think I had to spell that out to you.</p><p>Also, are you talking about grading out in regards to pure numbers, height, weight, 40 times and those kinds of things? The difference is that Fisher has done plenty on tape in real football games, that's why pretty much everybody has Fisher top 10 and nobody has Q up there. Last, height may or may not be an advantage but it's clearly not a disadvantage.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p></p><p>So now you are able to categorize people, their thinking, their intellect on the use of a single expression? I'm not hoping to be associated with you. In fact, it's that kind of narrow thinking.... that a single expression defines the user... that makes me wonder how you view the world.</p><p>That may make me look a bit patronizing and/or a little dim to your HRE but do you really think people in general will consider your view of me accurate? Because I used the term "outside the box" you think a greater than average percentage of the population will consider me dim? Patronizing maybe, I'll lay claim to that but dim? It's telling that you nitpick to this degree. One might think you are a bit **** and an angry little person, but I'm not saying it.</p><p> </p><p></p><p>Yep, do that math, you might notice that it doesn't make alot of sense to shuffle off high round draft picks and starters for a "maybe".</p><p>If Sherrod and Datko are healthy we have Newhouse, Sherrod, Datko, Bulaga and Barclay. You and I agree the guards are set but backing them up is Van Roten and again Barclay. You could say EDS but his backup is Van Roten and Garth Gerhart.</p><p>I have no idea what your intent of the count the number of free agent starters is meant to imply. Do you think the Pack should have signed more high priced free agents?</p><p>And I will not need you to notify me when you have an idea outside of the box, I'll recognize it for what it is. The fact that you acknowledge it happens confuses me... you just said that it's dim to use the term. If the Packers pass on Q I won't be hurt, it would seem to me that many teams would not feel a dire sense of loss if they didn't get him, else he'd be a top 10 pick like Fisher.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DevilDon, post: 495732, member: 2057"] Really HRE? The fact that MM said they were "looking" at Bulaga now suggests they're considering it? You might also want to point out that they are probably looking at every single possibility. Either way, my point was that does not put Newhouse or Sherrod in threat of not making the roster. Well there ya go genius. I was pointing out that it was unlikely he be moved to LT. What part is difficult for you to understand? I got that buddy, but at what point do you think that the upper echelons of the depth chart are in danger of losing jobs? If anybody, might it be a Datko or Barclay? You don't have to be a genius to figure that if a new starter is inherent or crowned the bottom of the depth chart is in peril, not the top. How was Barclay not expected to be an NFL player? Clearly TT thought he was. I would argue Newhouse is average but he does not suck. Your emotions are all over your sleeve HRE. He was a late round draft pick who is handling one of the premier positions in the NFL against the premier defensive players in the league. He's done OK and to me that spells success for a guy who was drafted so late. He's a stop gap and was due to be replaced but injuries negated that. I give him props for doing what he has so far. You should be able to read just a tiny bit between the lines. I didn't mean to imply Q could never be a starter, what I meant was that he wouldn't be expected to start this season. Sorry if you were confused about that. As a Packer fan who sees many UDFAs make the team and some start I would have thought you'd know I consider every pick to be a potential starter at some point. I didn't think I had to spell that out to you. Also, are you talking about grading out in regards to pure numbers, height, weight, 40 times and those kinds of things? The difference is that Fisher has done plenty on tape in real football games, that's why pretty much everybody has Fisher top 10 and nobody has Q up there. Last, height may or may not be an advantage but it's clearly not a disadvantage. So now you are able to categorize people, their thinking, their intellect on the use of a single expression? I'm not hoping to be associated with you. In fact, it's that kind of narrow thinking.... that a single expression defines the user... that makes me wonder how you view the world. That may make me look a bit patronizing and/or a little dim to your HRE but do you really think people in general will consider your view of me accurate? Because I used the term "outside the box" you think a greater than average percentage of the population will consider me dim? Patronizing maybe, I'll lay claim to that but dim? It's telling that you nitpick to this degree. One might think you are a bit **** and an angry little person, but I'm not saying it. Yep, do that math, you might notice that it doesn't make alot of sense to shuffle off high round draft picks and starters for a "maybe". If Sherrod and Datko are healthy we have Newhouse, Sherrod, Datko, Bulaga and Barclay. You and I agree the guards are set but backing them up is Van Roten and again Barclay. You could say EDS but his backup is Van Roten and Garth Gerhart. I have no idea what your intent of the count the number of free agent starters is meant to imply. Do you think the Pack should have signed more high priced free agents? And I will not need you to notify me when you have an idea outside of the box, I'll recognize it for what it is. The fact that you acknowledge it happens confuses me... you just said that it's dim to use the term. If the Packers pass on Q I won't be hurt, it would seem to me that many teams would not feel a dire sense of loss if they didn't get him, else he'd be a top 10 pick like Fisher. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Transfer portal and NIL Money, how they have changed college sports".
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 8:09 PM
College Sports
2022 Draft Romeo Doubs #132
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 7:55 PM
Draft Talk
NFC North Draft Review (2025)
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Yesterday at 4:57 PM
Draft Talk
Starting 5 - CB
Latest: gopkrs
Yesterday at 1:37 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Mediocre punters from da past and other things....
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Yesterday at 10:39 AM
NFL Discussions
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
2013 Draft Archive
Is Ted interested in this guy?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Transfer portal and NIL Money, how they have changed college sports".
