Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Is it time?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 993049"><p>Once again, if Andrew Brandt is right (and I trust him more than any of the talking heads out there) the teams know what's going to happen. Therefore Rodgers isn't holding anyone hostage.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>What is so difficult to understand about quoting only part of a post? Either I agree with the rest of or don't feel the need to comment on it. In this specific case I didn't care to reply to another poster bashing Rodgers for something.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I trust Andrew Brandt more than any of the reports commenting on the story.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It actually seems Gutekunst was the only lying when he indicated that the Packers want Rodgers back in his season ending press conference back in January.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Do you understand that a team and not individuals wins those Super Bowls???</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Once again, it's ridiculous to compare Dilfer and Rodgers based on Super Bowl wins as those are team achievements. The Ravens did a much better job surrounding Dilfer with talent than the Packers ever did with Rodgers. Or do you honestly believe the Packers wouldn't have won a Super Bowl with Rodgers while allowing a combined 23 points in four playoff games in any season??? </p><p></p><p>As far as the personal attacks (yet again), it's sad this has become the norm around here instead of having a civilized discussion. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Rodgers deserves part of the blame for the Packers coming up short of winning another Super Bowl, he's not one of the main reasons though.</p><p></p><p>As a side note, do you actually watch those games or solely take a look at the box score to figure out the quarterback is the one to blame? Once again, take a minute of your precious time and watch that interception against the Lions for once. It's pretty obvious Dillon was the one who didn't do his job, preventing Rodgers from stepping into his throw allowing the Lions to intercept it. Unfortunately you and some others don't care about that at all.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>There's no doubt Rodgers missed open receivers from time to time, just like every other quarterback in the league. On the other hand he targeted Adams as much as he did because Davante is an elite receiver and the Packers lack talent at the position aside of him.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deleted member 6794, post: 993049"] Once again, if Andrew Brandt is right (and I trust him more than any of the talking heads out there) the teams know what's going to happen. Therefore Rodgers isn't holding anyone hostage. What is so difficult to understand about quoting only part of a post? Either I agree with the rest of or don't feel the need to comment on it. In this specific case I didn't care to reply to another poster bashing Rodgers for something. I trust Andrew Brandt more than any of the reports commenting on the story. It actually seems Gutekunst was the only lying when he indicated that the Packers want Rodgers back in his season ending press conference back in January. Do you understand that a team and not individuals wins those Super Bowls??? Once again, it's ridiculous to compare Dilfer and Rodgers based on Super Bowl wins as those are team achievements. The Ravens did a much better job surrounding Dilfer with talent than the Packers ever did with Rodgers. Or do you honestly believe the Packers wouldn't have won a Super Bowl with Rodgers while allowing a combined 23 points in four playoff games in any season??? As far as the personal attacks (yet again), it's sad this has become the norm around here instead of having a civilized discussion. Rodgers deserves part of the blame for the Packers coming up short of winning another Super Bowl, he's not one of the main reasons though. As a side note, do you actually watch those games or solely take a look at the box score to figure out the quarterback is the one to blame? Once again, take a minute of your precious time and watch that interception against the Lions for once. It's pretty obvious Dillon was the one who didn't do his job, preventing Rodgers from stepping into his throw allowing the Lions to intercept it. Unfortunately you and some others don't care about that at all. There's no doubt Rodgers missed open receivers from time to time, just like every other quarterback in the league. On the other hand he targeted Adams as much as he did because Davante is an elite receiver and the Packers lack talent at the position aside of him. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: OldSchool101
33 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 8:45 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 WR room
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 6:56 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: weeds
Today at 6:47 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
M
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: mradtke66
Today at 6:08 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Is it time?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
