Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Is it time?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Magooch" data-source="post: 992241" data-attributes="member: 17987"><p>In some sense it feels like both sides don't have a lot of leverage honestly. </p><p></p><p>If everyone knows you're a seller...you lose leverage. But if everyone knows you're a buyer...you lose leverage, too. And right now it seems like the situation is that everyone knows Green Bay is a seller but also everyone knows New York are buyers. </p><p></p><p>So on one hand it seems pretty clear that we are looking to move Rodgers. And there aren't a ton of suitors at the moment, it would seem. That doesn't help us. </p><p></p><p>But on the other hand...everyone and their mom knows the Jets want to bring in a quality established QB. They have straight-up said as much. Carr is off the table, Brady is retired (and seems to be staying that way this time), they're not going to overpay for Jimmy G...so it would seem like they're either down to Lamar or Rodgers. Lamar is younger of course, but he'd cost two firsts and is demanding a contract that'd make Rodgers' look like a bargain. Rodgers is older and still not cheap, but he'll come with less long-term guaranteed money and won't cost as much to acquire. So in the same way...while we don't have a ton of suitors for Rodgers...the Jets don't have a ton of options to bring in at QB, either. </p><p></p><p>Ultimately then Green Bay's options are of course 1.) Rodgers returns; 2.) Rodgers retires; or 3.) Rodgers is traded. And I think we would prefer #3 (for the right price) at this point, but also would be okay with (and prepared for) #2. </p><p></p><p>With the Jets it's 1.) Trade for Rodgers; 2.) Make a bigger trade for Lamar and pay him more money; 3.) Overpay someone like Jimmy G; or 4.) Try to roll the dice with Zach Wilson again. </p><p></p><p>And so in that sense I guess my feeling is that Green Bay is probably more comfortable with #1 (Rodgers returning to GB for another season) than the Jets would be comfortable with overpaying for someone like Jimmy G or trying again with Wilson. In other words - even though our options are fairly limited I feel like we still are probably more comfortable with the options available to us than they are right now.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Magooch, post: 992241, member: 17987"] In some sense it feels like both sides don't have a lot of leverage honestly. If everyone knows you're a seller...you lose leverage. But if everyone knows you're a buyer...you lose leverage, too. And right now it seems like the situation is that everyone knows Green Bay is a seller but also everyone knows New York are buyers. So on one hand it seems pretty clear that we are looking to move Rodgers. And there aren't a ton of suitors at the moment, it would seem. That doesn't help us. But on the other hand...everyone and their mom knows the Jets want to bring in a quality established QB. They have straight-up said as much. Carr is off the table, Brady is retired (and seems to be staying that way this time), they're not going to overpay for Jimmy G...so it would seem like they're either down to Lamar or Rodgers. Lamar is younger of course, but he'd cost two firsts and is demanding a contract that'd make Rodgers' look like a bargain. Rodgers is older and still not cheap, but he'll come with less long-term guaranteed money and won't cost as much to acquire. So in the same way...while we don't have a ton of suitors for Rodgers...the Jets don't have a ton of options to bring in at QB, either. Ultimately then Green Bay's options are of course 1.) Rodgers returns; 2.) Rodgers retires; or 3.) Rodgers is traded. And I think we would prefer #3 (for the right price) at this point, but also would be okay with (and prepared for) #2. With the Jets it's 1.) Trade for Rodgers; 2.) Make a bigger trade for Lamar and pay him more money; 3.) Overpay someone like Jimmy G; or 4.) Try to roll the dice with Zach Wilson again. And so in that sense I guess my feeling is that Green Bay is probably more comfortable with #1 (Rodgers returning to GB for another season) than the Jets would be comfortable with overpaying for someone like Jimmy G or trying again with Wilson. In other words - even though our options are fairly limited I feel like we still are probably more comfortable with the options available to us than they are right now. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Prior to Training Camp - Predicting the 53 Man Roster
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
Yesterday at 11:32 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 9:27 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 8:45 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 WR room
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 6:56 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: weeds
Yesterday at 6:47 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Is it time?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Prior to Training Camp - Predicting the 53 Man Roster
