Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 992081">It doesn't make any sense to suggest Gutekunst could play hardball with Rodgers as well while ignoring the consequences of it (you know, the $100 million cap hit over the next two seasons).It's an interesting idea. I never thought about the Ravens being a possible destination for Rodgers. The Packers would need Rodgers to agree to spreading out that guaranteed money to make it work from a cap perspective. That's why I have suggested that they're most likely asking him to commit to at least playing another two seasons if they want to retain him. It's insane to suggest he should be the backup while making an additional $60 million though.I don't believe there's any viable option of keeping Rodgers for only a single season.While those general managers might think they're only a quarterback away from being a contender they need to convince Rodgers about it as well. None of those teams you mentioned had a decent defense though, making it a tough sell to #12 though.It was pretty obvious there wasn't any team trading for Carr as the Raiders would be forced to release him in mid-February. As Las Vegas allowed the Saints to talk to Carr before that happened there's nothing to complain about it.I don't think Rodgers would consider them being only a QB away from being a contender.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 406 (members: 0, guests: 406)