Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Is it time?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Magooch" data-source="post: 991605" data-attributes="member: 17987"><p>Yeah, I think the dilemma for GB is that they are definitely going to want a 2-year commitment out of Rodgers to bring him back at this point...if they think he will only be back for one year and then done I don't know that it makes much sense or is really that feasible.</p><p></p><p>Then of course the trouble is that a two year commitment from Rodgers probably means needing to move Love as I don't see us carrying the financial hit of both of them over two years. So then we would want to get some kind of trade return for Love. Maybe Gute's statements about him being ready to play are the truth and designed to insinuate that we're ready to move on from Rodgers, or maybe they're trying to pump Love's trade value...</p><p></p><p>Of course the trouble is that IMO these two things are kind of opposed to each other. Statements that would drive up Love's trade value would seem to drive down Rodgers' for us (i.e. if we go on and on about how good Love is and how we're convinced he can be our starting QB then that decreases Rodgers' value for us as he's no longer as essential to our team). And conversely I'd think statements that would drive up Rodgers' trade value - talking about how much we want to hang on to him, how valuable he is to us, etc...would perhaps hurt Love's potential trade value as they would (intentionally or otherwise) signal that we are not ready to move on and/or are not confident enough to have Love take over yet. </p><p></p><p>Further complicating matters is that while we are going to want a two year commitment from Rodgers that's probably what any team trading for him would want as well. Not exactly for the same reasons as us, but most teams are going to be hesitant to give up many assets for a one-year rental player. So I would suspect we would probably need to agree to some sort of deal with conditional bits provided he plays in 24/25 (for instance a 2023 1st and a 2024 2-3 that can become a 1-2 if he plays in '24 or something like that, with extra bits here and there)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Magooch, post: 991605, member: 17987"] Yeah, I think the dilemma for GB is that they are definitely going to want a 2-year commitment out of Rodgers to bring him back at this point...if they think he will only be back for one year and then done I don't know that it makes much sense or is really that feasible. Then of course the trouble is that a two year commitment from Rodgers probably means needing to move Love as I don't see us carrying the financial hit of both of them over two years. So then we would want to get some kind of trade return for Love. Maybe Gute's statements about him being ready to play are the truth and designed to insinuate that we're ready to move on from Rodgers, or maybe they're trying to pump Love's trade value... Of course the trouble is that IMO these two things are kind of opposed to each other. Statements that would drive up Love's trade value would seem to drive down Rodgers' for us (i.e. if we go on and on about how good Love is and how we're convinced he can be our starting QB then that decreases Rodgers' value for us as he's no longer as essential to our team). And conversely I'd think statements that would drive up Rodgers' trade value - talking about how much we want to hang on to him, how valuable he is to us, etc...would perhaps hurt Love's potential trade value as they would (intentionally or otherwise) signal that we are not ready to move on and/or are not confident enough to have Love take over yet. Further complicating matters is that while we are going to want a two year commitment from Rodgers that's probably what any team trading for him would want as well. Not exactly for the same reasons as us, but most teams are going to be hesitant to give up many assets for a one-year rental player. So I would suspect we would probably need to agree to some sort of deal with conditional bits provided he plays in 24/25 (for instance a 2023 1st and a 2024 2-3 that can become a 1-2 if he plays in '24 or something like that, with extra bits here and there) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
swhitset
rmontro
Magooch
Latest posts
H
Prior to Training Camp - Predicting the 53 Man Roster
Latest: Heyjoe4
30 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
55 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 2:58 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 2:37 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 2:36 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Is it time?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
