Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Is it time?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Krabs" data-source="post: 989556" data-attributes="member: 15739"><p>The Broncos laid an egg on that one. Just because one team does that does not set any sort of market. Each team will evaluate their needs and adjust accordingly. Like I said, I agree with most of what you said. I just don't agree that they will get any sort of significant value for Rodgers. One big difference is that with Wilson the contract he was carrying was lower. They went into it and gave him a new contract. Rodgers already has a gigantic contract for multiple seasons yet. It's hard to marry that up. I get it too that they could renegotiate once he in theory would be traded. With Wilson the Broncos were looking long term. With Rodgers teams know he has a year or two left. It's not long term and they are not going to give that sort of value for him. We are just not going to see eye to eye on this one. The most I see is a 2nd rounder and maybe a middling TE or something. It's all speculation anyway. All I know is if I were sitting in a GM's chair I wouldn't give a lot for him.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Krabs, post: 989556, member: 15739"] The Broncos laid an egg on that one. Just because one team does that does not set any sort of market. Each team will evaluate their needs and adjust accordingly. Like I said, I agree with most of what you said. I just don't agree that they will get any sort of significant value for Rodgers. One big difference is that with Wilson the contract he was carrying was lower. They went into it and gave him a new contract. Rodgers already has a gigantic contract for multiple seasons yet. It's hard to marry that up. I get it too that they could renegotiate once he in theory would be traded. With Wilson the Broncos were looking long term. With Rodgers teams know he has a year or two left. It's not long term and they are not going to give that sort of value for him. We are just not going to see eye to eye on this one. The most I see is a 2nd rounder and maybe a middling TE or something. It's all speculation anyway. All I know is if I were sitting in a GM's chair I wouldn't give a lot for him. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Heyjoe4
DoURant
Latest posts
H
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: Heyjoe4
2 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Today at 2:22 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Prior to Training Camp - Predicting the 53 Man Roster
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
Yesterday at 11:32 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 8:45 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 WR room
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 6:56 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Is it time?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top