Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Is it time?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 989461"><p>Well, you said that adding a veteran QB has 100% worked for teams as of late, therefore I brought up Wilson. My point is that teams might be hesitant to give up a king's ransom in a trade for an aging quarterback who is coming of a subpar season based on what happened with the Broncos this season.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>A team moving on from a player before the end of a contract close to always results in some kind of cap relief (aside of fully guaranteed contracts like the one Deshaun Watson signed with the Browns). The Packers need to consider if they prefer to take a cap hit of $40 million in dead money for Rodgers to not be on the team next season compared to the additional costs it would take to keep him around for at least another year.</p><p></p><p>At this point it seems to be uncertain which direction they're headed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deleted member 6794, post: 989461"] Well, you said that adding a veteran QB has 100% worked for teams as of late, therefore I brought up Wilson. My point is that teams might be hesitant to give up a king's ransom in a trade for an aging quarterback who is coming of a subpar season based on what happened with the Broncos this season. A team moving on from a player before the end of a contract close to always results in some kind of cap relief (aside of fully guaranteed contracts like the one Deshaun Watson signed with the Browns). The Packers need to consider if they prefer to take a cap hit of $40 million in dead money for Rodgers to not be on the team next season compared to the additional costs it would take to keep him around for at least another year. At this point it seems to be uncertain which direction they're headed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Heyjoe4
The General
Latest posts
H
Free Agency Thread
Latest: Heyjoe4
37 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers OL Types
Latest: DoURant
Yesterday at 8:16 PM
Draft Talk
2024 Clusters
Latest: tynimiller
Yesterday at 7:45 PM
Draft Talk
Corbin Burnes traded to Orioles.
Latest: weeds
Yesterday at 7:34 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Badger buckets 2023-2024
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 5:56 PM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Is it time?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top