Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 989243" data-attributes="member: 10086">We’ve done ok with what we’ve used (TE in a Pass blocking capacity) but that’s more because of a veteran QB and RB group.Before this season began, in interview w/McAfee, Tonyan eluded to us having to use him at inline TE more earlier in season to cover deficiencies. I think we rely too much on that concept. You take your veteran TE1, who btw is arguably a top 5 Receiving target and is a primary option for #12 and dedicate him to try to shore up a deficiency OL? All that is would be a temporary Bandaid on a substantial injury that’s needs professional attention.Sure, cover the sore temporary so it’s not infected, but get to the Doctor and get it fixed. Instead we pretend that we don’t need TE1 as a receiver. I’d argue that next to WR1? TE1 is imperative. Right now we have neitherLook around the league this Postseason. Which teams don’t use a TE as a top couple choice for Receiving?  Why do we think it’s ok not to? What do the remaining Winners have in common at TE? Hayden HurstTravis Kelce.George KittleDallas GoedertThe weakest team at TE has Ja’Marr Chase, Tee Higgins and Tyler Boyd for receiving options. In regular season that WR trifecta averaged 946 yards per man</blockquote>

Total: 397 (members: 2, guests: 395)