Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Is it time?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Magooch" data-source="post: 988646" data-attributes="member: 17987"><p>That’s more or less where I’ve started to settle.</p><p></p><p>Rodgers is a great QB. One of the best of all-time. And in a vacuum he probably DOES give us a better chance of winning than Love does. Even in decline it's fair to say Rodgers is still the better QB...and frankly I'm inclined to believe that this year was perhaps a bit of an anomaly and not a totally accurate reflection of where Rodgers is at as a player presently. </p><p></p><p>BUT all that being said...for one reason or another it is simply not working for us when push comes to shove. In 12 seasons since winning the Super Bowl in 2010 we have a total of 7 playoff wins. And that's not to say those are all on Rodgers by any means. Sometimes you could say the lion's share of blame would lie on the defense. Other times on special teams. Other time on coaching, other times on teammates, other times on just plain dumb bad luck, and so on. But the bottom line is that it hasn't worked out. Obviously that's no guarantee that it would have "worked" with someone else and that in and of itself is arguably not enough to justify a change, but...</p><p></p><p>And this isn't a slight on Rodgers or anyone in particular either. There have been plenty of instances where a player or coach simply needs a change of scenery and that ends up benefitting one or both parties. It's not that they are a bad player or "finished" or whatever but for some reason (that can often be hard to define and/or a bit mysterious) the pairing of player+team just doesn't seem to totally click when it really counts. Maybe an easy obvious example is with Matt Stafford and Jared Goff. Stafford wasn't going to win anything with the Lions and Goff wasn't going to win it for the Rams. Stafford joins the Rams and immediately leads them to the Super Bowl while Goff turns things around a bit in Detroit and ultimately you could say that all four parties (Stafford, Goff, Detroit, LA) all benefitted from it. It is what it is.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Magooch, post: 988646, member: 17987"] That’s more or less where I’ve started to settle. Rodgers is a great QB. One of the best of all-time. And in a vacuum he probably DOES give us a better chance of winning than Love does. Even in decline it's fair to say Rodgers is still the better QB...and frankly I'm inclined to believe that this year was perhaps a bit of an anomaly and not a totally accurate reflection of where Rodgers is at as a player presently. BUT all that being said...for one reason or another it is simply not working for us when push comes to shove. In 12 seasons since winning the Super Bowl in 2010 we have a total of 7 playoff wins. And that's not to say those are all on Rodgers by any means. Sometimes you could say the lion's share of blame would lie on the defense. Other times on special teams. Other time on coaching, other times on teammates, other times on just plain dumb bad luck, and so on. But the bottom line is that it hasn't worked out. Obviously that's no guarantee that it would have "worked" with someone else and that in and of itself is arguably not enough to justify a change, but... And this isn't a slight on Rodgers or anyone in particular either. There have been plenty of instances where a player or coach simply needs a change of scenery and that ends up benefitting one or both parties. It's not that they are a bad player or "finished" or whatever but for some reason (that can often be hard to define and/or a bit mysterious) the pairing of player+team just doesn't seem to totally click when it really counts. Maybe an easy obvious example is with Matt Stafford and Jared Goff. Stafford wasn't going to win anything with the Lions and Goff wasn't going to win it for the Rams. Stafford joins the Rams and immediately leads them to the Super Bowl while Goff turns things around a bit in Detroit and ultimately you could say that all four parties (Stafford, Goff, Detroit, LA) all benefitted from it. It is what it is. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Prior to Training Camp - Predicting the 53 Man Roster
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
Yesterday at 11:32 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 9:27 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 8:45 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 WR room
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 6:56 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: weeds
Yesterday at 6:47 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Is it time?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Prior to Training Camp - Predicting the 53 Man Roster
