1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!

    Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers. You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Sign Up or

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!
    Dismiss Notice

Interesting view on Sherman extension

Discussion in 'Green Bay Packers Fan Forum' started by FL Packer, Aug 24, 2005.

  1. FL Packer

    FL Packer Cheesehead

    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2005
    Location:
    St Petersburg, FL
    From Profootball Talk.com
    The decision of the Packers to give coach Mike Sherman a contract extension of only two years essentially means, in our view, that new G.M. Ted Thompson has "hired" Sherman pursuant to the standard three-year contract that many newly-minted head coaches get.



    And it also means that if Sherman doesn't keep the team competitive and/or push it back to prominence within the next couple of seasons, Thompson will have the ability to make another head-coaching hire.



    It's a common, and unfortunate, phenomenon in the NFL. The General Manager's accountability is far less immediate than the head coach's. And the G.M. typically can get away with screwing the piooch with the first head coach that he hires (see Donahoe, Tom), even though the guy who hired the head coach that tanked should at least bear some responsibility for the failure.



    This dynamic, in our view, is one of the main reasons why most teams can't, and won't, duplicate the success of a franchise like the Patriots. In New England, the coaching staff and the front office are on a leash of identical length. Thus, neither department has anything to gain by blaming the other if/when the thing goes bad. (If it ever does.) Instead, everyone works together because either everyone succeeds together, or everyone fails together.



    So, in Green Bay, Sherman's three-year deal means that if the team tanks, Mike takes the fall -- and Thompson gets a do-over.
     
  2. Greg C.

    Greg C. Cheesehead

    Messages:
    2,856
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 31, 2005
    Location:
    Marquette, Michigan
    That IS an interesting view. I didn't know that the Patriots structure was different from most others.

    This guy thinks it is unfair that coaches are given a shorter leash than GM's, but I don't see any problem with that. It takes a few years to see how a GM's draft picks pan out, while the quality of a coach is usually apparent much more quickly.
     
  3. calicheesehead

    calicheesehead Cheesehead

    Messages:
    742
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2005
    Location:
    91214
    Poor bastard...only gets 6.4 million guaranteed for 2 years worth of work. :lol:
     
  4. kuston

    kuston Cheesehead

    Messages:
    73
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Greg the Patriots GM and coach is the same guy.
     
  5. PWT36

    PWT36 Cheesehead

    Messages:
    895
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2005
    Location:
    De pere, Wi.
    calicheesehead-says:" Poor [email protected]@rd...only gets 6.4 million guaranteed for 2 years worth of work."-------- The big money in NFL in the new century is a fact of life. And the NFL head coach should benefit from it and is. As example, tight end Bubba Franks just received 6 million dollars reporting bonus for signing his contract. The Packers are rewarding Mike Sherman for his five year coaching record of 53-27 which put him up there as 4th best Head coach in Packer history and since 1970 only Chuck Knox, Joe Gibbs, and Mike Ditka had better records in their first five seasons. None of those coaches before 1993 had to contend with competitve balance (free agency and salary cap) as present day NFL coaches like Mike Sherman have to. . The NFL is by far the number 1 Pro sport in the world and as such, NFL takes in huge revenues and it reflects in the compensation paid the players, as well as the coaches in NFL.
     
  6. P@ck66

    [email protected] Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,207
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    PWT

    You can't POSSIBLY be saying that Mike Sherman is as good a coach as CHUCK KNOX, JOE GIBBS, OR MIKE DITKA...are you?

    If you are..then i seriously quetion your judgement....

    (next you'll be saying he's as good as LOMBARDI...)
     
  7. DePack

    DePack Cheesehead

    Messages:
    3,904
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Location:
    Newark, Delaware
    So this hack thinks that "if Sherman doesn't keep the team competitive and/or push it back to prominance within the next couple seasons, Thompson will have the ability to make a new coaching hire".

    What a friggin' genius. Isn't that pretty much the way it is on every other NFL team? If the coach sucks the GM can hire another one? Thanks for enlightening us Football talk.com.
     
  8. Ryan

    Ryan Cheesehead

    Messages:
    3,371
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2004
    Location:
    Omaha, NE
    He didn't say that. He said he had a comparable record in the first 5 years. Just comparing stats. What's the problem with that?
     
  9. digsthepack

    digsthepack Cheesehead

    Messages:
    2,486
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    A positive statement about Sherman always gets things wound up!
     
  10. Ryan

    Ryan Cheesehead

    Messages:
    3,371
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2004
    Location:
    Omaha, NE
    No kidding. I never thought that on a Packers forum that support for a member of their staff would be so outragous. Guess I'm too much of a cheerleader. Or maybe it's because I know that what I think isn't going to have an effect on the Packers decisions.
     
  11. CaliforniaCheez

    CaliforniaCheez Cheesehead

    Messages:
    2,486
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2005
    Location:
    Citrus Heights CA
    I often think people get Sherman the coach confused with Sherman the GM.

    Unlike many I have a memory. In 2000 when the team started out slow Sherman got them believing and had a great second half of the season.

    In 2004 in the final 11 games the Packers were 9-2. Keeping a team from giving up on itself when the chips are down is the mark of a good coach.
     
  12. Zero2Cool

    Zero2Cool I own a website

    Messages:
    11,903
    Likes Received:
    4
    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Location:
    Green Bay, WI
    Packer Fan Since:
    1989

    YOUR PROBLEM IS YOU SEE THE GLASS HALF FULL AND GALL DANGIT ITS HALF EMPTY NOW SEE IT LIKE THE REST OF'EM.


    /sarcasm
     

Share This Page

-->