Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="PFanCan" data-source="post: 483754" data-attributes="member: 1989">Just for grins, let's look at BOTH sides of the ball and compare the Packers depth chart to the 49ers. Using the Packers injuries to define the template, I color coded the chart approximately as follows: Dark red = significant injury (IR, or most of season lost) Med red = 4-8 games missed Lt red = 1-4 games missed[ATTACH=full]2074[/ATTACH] So, in this hypothetical situation, how well would the 49ers have been had they lost Gore for the bulk of the season (and backups injured as well), the entire O-line messed up with two gone for the season, the top two WRs missing many games, both Willis and his backup gone, and Whitner? Or, said another way: How good would the Packers be if they were NOT the most injured team in all the NFL this year? (and last year, and the year we won the Super Bowl).</blockquote>

Total: 338 (members: 3, guests: 335)