Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
I don't understand this "lockout" talk
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SpartaChris" data-source="post: 301595" data-attributes="member: 1007"><p>********. The owners are asking the players to take a pay cut since the players aren't responsible for the increased costs that come with new stadiums or expansions. They also aren't responsible for generating new revenue through partnerships or other business investments. These are all things that costs money, none of which the players have to pay. By refusing to take a pay cut to help the owners grow the pie, the players are essentially holding out for more money.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So their health care costs aren't covered during their playing career? </p><p></p><p>Whether the players deserve it for the rest of their lives or not is debatable. My thought is if the teams want to provide it, great. It shouldn't be required though. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Did you know that every single player in the NFL chooses to play football rather than do something else? And spare me the "But careers are short" nonsense. Every single player knows what they're signing up for. Every. Single. Player. If they want a longer career, find something else to do. </p><p></p><p>As for no health care being offered in 2011, so what? They're not at work, so why should the league be forced to provide it? How about the players save their money and pay for insurance for when they're out of work? Sorry, but when players like Dez Bryant can drop $52,000 on dinner, it's hard to gain my sympathies. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You mean what this lockout is all about from one perspective, right? Because your information isn't impartial by any means. It doesn't address any of the owners concerns, nor does it address the fan concerns. So lets call it what it is: An NFLPA authored propaganda piece.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SpartaChris, post: 301595, member: 1007"] ********. The owners are asking the players to take a pay cut since the players aren't responsible for the increased costs that come with new stadiums or expansions. They also aren't responsible for generating new revenue through partnerships or other business investments. These are all things that costs money, none of which the players have to pay. By refusing to take a pay cut to help the owners grow the pie, the players are essentially holding out for more money. So their health care costs aren't covered during their playing career? Whether the players deserve it for the rest of their lives or not is debatable. My thought is if the teams want to provide it, great. It shouldn't be required though. Did you know that every single player in the NFL chooses to play football rather than do something else? And spare me the "But careers are short" nonsense. Every single player knows what they're signing up for. Every. Single. Player. If they want a longer career, find something else to do. As for no health care being offered in 2011, so what? They're not at work, so why should the league be forced to provide it? How about the players save their money and pay for insurance for when they're out of work? Sorry, but when players like Dez Bryant can drop $52,000 on dinner, it's hard to gain my sympathies. You mean what this lockout is all about from one perspective, right? Because your information isn't impartial by any means. It doesn't address any of the owners concerns, nor does it address the fan concerns. So lets call it what it is: An NFLPA authored propaganda piece. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Today at 5:13 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 12:42 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 11:14 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 10:32 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Off Season News
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 2:18 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
I don't understand this "lockout" talk
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
