without a doubt
I'm guessing we would have tried to make a move for a vet (Green?) to battle Rodgers. I don't know that you want two rookies as your QBs in camp.If Favre would have hung up his cleats before the draft, would we have taken Quinn when he fell?
Don't kid yourself. Every team had Quinn rated better in this draft than they had Rodgers ranked in that draft.Packnic said:without a doubt
I think you meant no way. That would mean they think he's better than Rodgers, in which case they should've/would've taken him anyway.
It was easily the weakest QB class of our generation. It was obvious that whichever QB didn't go #1 was going to fall off the face of a cliff. Miami passing on Quinn was much more shocking than Rodgers' fall to 24.
In their defense, a 180 lb. WR that runs a sub 4.3 when completely healthy, supposedly.kmac said:It was easily the weakest QB class of our generation. It was obvious that whichever QB didn't go #1 was going to fall off the face of a cliff. Miami passing on Quinn was much more shocking than Rodgers' fall to 24.
And for a 180lb wide receiver at that???????
Don't kid yourself. Every team had Quinn rated better in this draft than they had Rodgers ranked in that draft.YERCELL said:Packnic said:without a doubt
I think you meant no way. That would mean they think he's better than Rodgers, in which case they should've/would've taken him anyway.
In their defense, a 180 lb. WR that runs a sub 4.3 when completely healthy, supposedly.DakotaT said:kmac said:It was easily the weakest QB class of our generation. It was obvious that whichever QB didn't go #1 was going to fall off the face of a cliff. Miami passing on Quinn was much more shocking than Rodgers' fall to 24.
And for a 180lb wide receiver at that???????
It's very obvious that taking players at positions of need became much more popular than BPA this year. That explains the picks of Levi Jones, Ted Ginn, Marshawn Lynch, and Justin Harrell.
all about da packers said:Oh, and Quinn's girl looked somewhat hot, so that doesn't hurt either. :lol:
Greg C. said:I'm still waiting to hear if any team has ever drafted two first-round QB's within three years. It would make sense only if the first one was already a bust, but Rodgers hasn't had a chance to prove himself one way or another yet. Plus you would have two QB's earning first-round money. That's just stupid. At some point you have to pick a guy and go with him.
I suppose they could've drafted Quinn then traded Rodgers, but by all accounts, management still thinks Rodgers is going to be good, yet they would not be able to get good value for him in a trade.
all about da packers said:I think Yercell raises a good point.
Regradless, IF I WAS TT, then I'd have taken Quinn, if (and only if) Favre had retired before the draft.
I'm a firm believer in the philosophy that if you have the chance to draft a potential 'franchise' QB, you do it. (Obviously, there are exceptions to the rule such as the Pats and Bengals, since they have young franchise QBs already)
History indicates that Rodgers doesn't have that great of a chance in successfully taking the throne after Favre leaves, so I'd have gotten another QB to protect myself.
Since I'm TT, and my future is riding on Rodgers working out, I'd have taken Quinn to give me another couple of years or two at the helm in case Rodgers was a bust.
Oh, and Quinn's girl looked somewhat hot, so that doesn't hurt either. :lol: