Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
************ hurt
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Quientus" data-source="post: 252887" data-attributes="member: 1834"><p>Heh ... you were that "exited" about watching you didn't notice ? :stinker:</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Still, while the defense needs to "stay in the game" till the end, it does bode well that the offense is as "potent" as "advertised" ... As long as teams still "insists" on stacking the box with 8-9 - #4 will get plenty of room and chances to find the "ever expanding" receiver corps he has at his disposal ... Think he had completions to 7-8 different receivers ? Including one to AP ... - I'm sure further down the stretch that there will be more passes to AP ...</p><p> </p><p>Would it have made a difference ? Might have, might not have ... - The way Flacco was playing, even while being pounded, suggest he (Flacco - another 2nd year starter btw ...) would have made the throws anyway ...</p><p> </p><p>Even with Winfield out and Benny Sapp the Vikings still managed to win that game, regardless that alot of people say it should have been Ravens that won ... End result was a win ... and when the tally is made going into the play offs few will remember the ugly wins ... but only the final wins vs losses ...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Quientus, post: 252887, member: 1834"] Heh ... you were that "exited" about watching you didn't notice ? :stinker: Still, while the defense needs to "stay in the game" till the end, it does bode well that the offense is as "potent" as "advertised" ... As long as teams still "insists" on stacking the box with 8-9 - #4 will get plenty of room and chances to find the "ever expanding" receiver corps he has at his disposal ... Think he had completions to 7-8 different receivers ? Including one to AP ... - I'm sure further down the stretch that there will be more passes to AP ... Would it have made a difference ? Might have, might not have ... - The way Flacco was playing, even while being pounded, suggest he (Flacco - another 2nd year starter btw ...) would have made the throws anyway ... Even with Winfield out and Benny Sapp the Vikings still managed to win that game, regardless that alot of people say it should have been Ravens that won ... End result was a win ... and when the tally is made going into the play offs few will remember the ugly wins ... but only the final wins vs losses ... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 11:12 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: tynimiller
Yesterday at 10:57 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 3:04 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Movies and TV shows Thread
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 2:00 PM
Movies and Entertainment
M
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Magooch
Yesterday at 11:43 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
************ hurt
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top