Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
How Should We Evaluate a Defense?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 793284"><p>Football Outsiders' DVOA rankings might present the best available metric to evaluate a defense. The Packers unit was ranked 17th according to them entering week 6. </p><p></p><p>Their grading system is explained here:</p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.footballoutsiders.com/info/methods" target="_blank">https://www.footballoutsiders.com/info/methods</a></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Clinton-Dix is an above average safety who has stabilized the play at the position ever since being drafted. The Packers better have an adequate replacement for him on the roster if they decide to move on this offseason as it seems fans have already forgotten about the terrible play at safety for years before his arrival.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The Packers should definitely not trade one of their first rounders next season for Peterson. They have enough young talent at the position to pass on him.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deleted member 6794, post: 793284"] Football Outsiders' DVOA rankings might present the best available metric to evaluate a defense. The Packers unit was ranked 17th according to them entering week 6. Their grading system is explained here: [URL]https://www.footballoutsiders.com/info/methods[/URL] Clinton-Dix is an above average safety who has stabilized the play at the position ever since being drafted. The Packers better have an adequate replacement for him on the roster if they decide to move on this offseason as it seems fans have already forgotten about the terrible play at safety for years before his arrival. The Packers should definitely not trade one of their first rounders next season for Peterson. They have enough young talent at the position to pass on him. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Emur
sschind
shockerx
DoURant
Pkrjones
Latest posts
S
Free Agency Thread
Latest: sschind
4 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Rodgers for Vice President?
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
5 minutes ago
Aaron Rodgers Discusson
2024 Draft Prospect Discussions
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
10 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Prospects you are A LOT higher on than consensus…
Latest: tynimiller
21 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Final Annoying Mock/Prediction
Latest: tynimiller
24 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
How Should We Evaluate a Defense?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top