Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1065997" data-attributes="member: 10086">I can see both sides. We spent a PAIR of Day 2 selections recently which is a ton of Draft Capital at the TE position. My idea pre draft was to go out and get a Player that graded high in the blocking aspect but might also have just enough proficiency to catch a Pass here and there. Problem was my ideal options were graded in that 4th-6th  draft Rounds and honestly there were just too many good Defenders on the Board. You gotta draw the line somewhere.I’m totally agreeable in spreading resources though. You go back to the Georgia vs Texas Championship game. That was a Back n Forth punches thrown through OT and imo if not for a pair of missed FG’s by Texas could’ve been a Longhorns Victory. It’s like they had the Spirit of Narveson for a Placekicker. We peeled off 4 Players from that high level game. Golden, Sorrell, Brinson and Stackhouse.I’m totally ok with the trade off of not spending resources on a Blocking TE that might see 25% snaps or less not that Musgrave looks healthy.I still think 1 of either Sorrell or Oliver is going to surprise us. Meaning like 4th and 5th Rounds versions of Karl Brooks type disruption. I feel like both players in many drafts would’ve went more like 3rd/4th Rounds. Oliver is crazy athletic, he’s like an undersized heat seeking missile. If he disrupts a play early our LB’s are going to Mop some people up.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 934 (members: 0, guests: 934)