Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="porky88" data-source="post: 138094" data-attributes="member: 489">Did you read the article? Evidently not. This market is okay. It's not very strong. Half the guys you named aren't part of the free agent market. They're available through trade.McGahee and Jones are both under contract and only available with compensation. Bly available through trade. A division rival at that. Briggs available through trade and is a franchise player. He‘s under contract for one more year now. Another division rival too.London Fletcher is a good but aging player. Would you pay 80 million for Nate Clements and 22 up front for him when we already have Woodson and Harris?Keep in mind if the Packers do that then the contracts Woodson and Harris get look like jokes and it gives them a very legit reason to hold out.Every single media outlet has called this a fairly weak class for the most front. The additions of Porter and Henry helped but it’s far from the best class in the last ten year. Your entitled to your opinion but at least look at all four sides of the square.</blockquote>

Total: 63 (members: 3, guests: 60)