CaliforniaCheez
Cheesehead
Our first round draft pick has achieved a 19.4 passer rating.
It is a good thing we passed on DT's Louis Castillo(#28 San Diego), Shaun Cody(#37 Detroit), and Mike Patterson(#31 Philadelphia). Otherwise we would be cutting Kenny Peterson and/or James Lee who were both worth two draft picks each.
We now will be cutting J.T. O'Sullivan who is second on team in passer rating which is also 3 times Rodgers' passer rating.
Really ask yourself if he was a free agent wouldn't he be behind O'Sullivan on depth chart and soon to be cut.
The drafting of Aaron Rodgers was a "no brainer" (no thought). His 19.4 passer rating against second team defenses has impressed enough for him to earn the low tech clipboard duties and get coffee at meetings.
Excuses can be made like:
1) He is only a rookie. True and I did not expect much.
2) He will pay off in the future. At what cost today? Is it worth it?
3) He had to play against 2nd team defenses. So during the season we can expect worse?
4) He was so valuable the Packers HAD to take him at #24. Yes, Mel Kiper said so.
5) Now we get to replace Nall and O'Sullivan in 2006. So our situation will be better in 2006 with him than without him. Where do you find the 06 #2? At what cost?
The more serious question is that Rodgers has not acquired a nickname yet. Should it be Jamal or Reynolds??
Heir Apparent or Apparent error?
It is a good thing we passed on DT's Louis Castillo(#28 San Diego), Shaun Cody(#37 Detroit), and Mike Patterson(#31 Philadelphia). Otherwise we would be cutting Kenny Peterson and/or James Lee who were both worth two draft picks each.
We now will be cutting J.T. O'Sullivan who is second on team in passer rating which is also 3 times Rodgers' passer rating.
Really ask yourself if he was a free agent wouldn't he be behind O'Sullivan on depth chart and soon to be cut.
The drafting of Aaron Rodgers was a "no brainer" (no thought). His 19.4 passer rating against second team defenses has impressed enough for him to earn the low tech clipboard duties and get coffee at meetings.
Excuses can be made like:
1) He is only a rookie. True and I did not expect much.
2) He will pay off in the future. At what cost today? Is it worth it?
3) He had to play against 2nd team defenses. So during the season we can expect worse?
4) He was so valuable the Packers HAD to take him at #24. Yes, Mel Kiper said so.
5) Now we get to replace Nall and O'Sullivan in 2006. So our situation will be better in 2006 with him than without him. Where do you find the 06 #2? At what cost?
The more serious question is that Rodgers has not acquired a nickname yet. Should it be Jamal or Reynolds??
Heir Apparent or Apparent error?