Yeah Ruegs would have been a good resign I think and its a good point Pack66. The problem is guys are going to go elsewhere and you are not going to get every FA that you want.
Why does it seem that everything is either one way or another.
First, you got TRO, TT's right hand man, who defends every move TT makes. He even found a way to say Cundiff was a good signing.
Then.......
You got Pack 66 who would love to kick in TT's teeth. Every move TT makes is the wrong one, he should have resigned every player GB lost and Every Free Agent available.
I think its funny but honestly I think that its hard to take anything you guys say seriously because I know its biased and not looked at from an objective perspective.
I think most Packer fans are somewhere in the middle. Could TT have done more? No Doubt. Could have TT done less? Of course.
On one side Cundiff was a good signing, and on the other we should have signed Larry Allen who is a fat,old washed up lineman who doesn't fit the scheme at all.
I do not try to speak for everyone but I think......
Cundiff was a bad signing
Letting Ruegamer go was a bad decision
Not getting AV was a bad decision, but not really TT's fault
Resigning Davenport struck me as odd as well.
TT did nothing in the off-season last year, horrendous job.
On the other side of things
Resigning Green,Henderson,Kampman etc was a good decision
Pickett was a good sign
Boerichter was a good sign
Taylor was a good sign
TT giving Brett time is a good thing
and then
Keeping Fergie's *** around is questionable
Manual is risky but could pay off
It's not black and white in the eyes of the majority of posters here. We like some moves, we dislike others. Understand that there are 31 other teams looking for players and trying to improve. You win some, you lose some but unless you are doing one or the other really good or really bad you will be a middle of the road team.
