Green Bay Packers Offensive Line Depth: Plenty of Unanswered Questions

[JLW_51]

http://lastwordonprofootball.com/2017/07/27/packers-offensive-line-depth-questions/

 

[PikeBadger]

http://lastwordonprofootball.com/2017/07/27/packers-offensive-line-depth-questions/

Not very concerned about this unit.

 

[Deleted member 6794]

Not very concerned about this unit.

There's no reason to be concerned about the starters on the offensive line, depth on the interior is a question mark though.

 

[PikeBadger]

There's no reason to be concerned about the starters on the offensive line, depth on the interior is a question mark though.

In the sense of who the backups will be. I have confidence that the quality of backups will be sufficient. My biggest question is, how long will it take the starting unit to become cohesive with Evans stepping in to RG.

 

[Deleted member 6794]

In the sense of who the backups will be. I have confidence that the quality of backups will be sufficient. My biggest question is, how long will it take the starting unit to become cohesive with Evans stepping in to RG.

I'm not worried about Evans fitting right in as the starting RG but there's no denying the Packers don't have any proven backups on the roster.

 

[Poppa San]

I'm not worried about Evans fitting right in as the starting RG but there's no denying the Packers don't have any proven backups on the roster.

Barclay. Better at guard than tackle. Not sure about him a center but Aaron is.

 

[Deleted member 6794]

Barclay. Better at guard than tackle. Not sure about him a center but Aaron is.

Well, I wouldn't feel comfortable about Barclay having to start anywhere on the offensive line though.