Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Great Read - Packers Should Do Whatever Brett Tells Them
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Since69" data-source="post: 231421" data-attributes="member: 371"><p>I keep hearing this argument, and repeatedly on NFL Radio on Sirius, and I can't see any strength in it. What would the Packers have done differently? Brohm was (apparently) the BPA at #56 - and Ted certainly hasn't ever shied away from drafting a player high at a position of strength. We probably wouldn't have taken Flynn in the 7th, but who's to say where his name was on TT's draft board?</p><p></p><p>I refuse to believe that over the course of two OTAs MM has changed the gameplan or the playbook to any significant degree. Likewise, I refuse to believe that the rest of the team has irreversibly bonded with Rodgers. Indeed, PFT's Rumor Mill has an article about how many Packers are talking about getting "their QB" back.</p><p></p><p>I agree with the crux of the article's argument: The positives seemingly outweigh the negatives by a large margin, and welcoming Brett back gives us a better chance at another title. And that's the name of the game for every GM in the league.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Since69, post: 231421, member: 371"] I keep hearing this argument, and repeatedly on NFL Radio on Sirius, and I can't see any strength in it. What would the Packers have done differently? Brohm was (apparently) the BPA at #56 - and Ted certainly hasn't ever shied away from drafting a player high at a position of strength. We probably wouldn't have taken Flynn in the 7th, but who's to say where his name was on TT's draft board? I refuse to believe that over the course of two OTAs MM has changed the gameplan or the playbook to any significant degree. Likewise, I refuse to believe that the rest of the team has irreversibly bonded with Rodgers. Indeed, PFT's Rumor Mill has an article about how many Packers are talking about getting "their QB" back. I agree with the crux of the article's argument: The positives seemingly outweigh the negatives by a large margin, and welcoming Brett back gives us a better chance at another title. And that's the name of the game for every GM in the league. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Firethorn1001
Latest posts
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: milani
Today at 3:42 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: RicFlairoftheNFL
Today at 3:25 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 1:32 AM
Draft Talk
I had This Nightmare
Latest: Poppa San
Yesterday at 10:58 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
2024 Draft Prospect Discussions
Latest: Schultz
Yesterday at 10:41 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Great Read - Packers Should Do Whatever Brett Tells Them
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top