Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Grading the Packers’ position groups based on advanced statistics
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="El Guapo" data-source="post: 895093" data-attributes="member: 5830"><p>I'm not sure that the offense gets straight-A's across the board. It's tempting to give the WRs an A-minus as the writer did, but it just isn't correct. Adams was the A+, Lazard was an A+ for the game before his injury and a solid B after for his blocking and occasional catch. The most damning statement was at the end of his WR analysis: "<strong><u>Other people existed at the position and did effectively nothing.</u></strong>"</p><p></p><p>I'm also not sure that the Packers have their LBs of the future in Kris Barnes and Kamal Martin. They still need to be looking at FA linebackers and have a few on their target list for the draft. It feels a bit like 2010 when UDFAs Frank Zombo and Erik Walden played above their pay grade. I'm not sure that Barnes & Martin will be able to sustain it at this level long term.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="El Guapo, post: 895093, member: 5830"] I'm not sure that the offense gets straight-A's across the board. It's tempting to give the WRs an A-minus as the writer did, but it just isn't correct. Adams was the A+, Lazard was an A+ for the game before his injury and a solid B after for his blocking and occasional catch. The most damning statement was at the end of his WR analysis: "[B][U]Other people existed at the position and did effectively nothing.[/U][/B]" I'm also not sure that the Packers have their LBs of the future in Kris Barnes and Kamal Martin. They still need to be looking at FA linebackers and have a few on their target list for the draft. It feels a bit like 2010 when UDFAs Frank Zombo and Erik Walden played above their pay grade. I'm not sure that Barnes & Martin will be able to sustain it at this level long term. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Firethorn1001
Latest posts
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: milani
Today at 3:42 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: RicFlairoftheNFL
Today at 3:25 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 1:32 AM
Draft Talk
I had This Nightmare
Latest: Poppa San
Yesterday at 10:58 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
2024 Draft Prospect Discussions
Latest: Schultz
Yesterday at 10:41 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Grading the Packers’ position groups based on advanced statistics
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top