Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="pantherd" data-source="post: 71435" data-attributes="member: 284">They say the "instant grades" by nearly everyone are ridiculous as it takes atleast three years to grade a draft.  That having been said, here is the '03 team by team draft:<http://www.nfl.com/draft/history/teams/years/2003>scroll her for link: <a href="http://www.nfl.com/draft/history/teams/years/2003" target="_blank">http://www.nfl.com/draft/history/teams/years/2003</a>Top 51) NE - First 6 picks are major contributors2) Cincy  - Day 1 awesome, Palmer may be 2nd best QB in the league3) Indy - Clark and Doss day 1.  Mathis and June 5th & 6th round. You kiddin' me?4) Arizona - Seems they always draft well, but doesn't equal wins?5) NYG - Beefed up DL in a hurryBottom 55) ATL - Griffith, FB, is your best pick?4) MIA - Ever heard of any of these guys?  (Actually I know Jenkins because he was QB at South Carolina)3) NYJ - Some flops these guys turned out to be2) San Diego - Some depth guys, but no impact players1) OAK - 5 first day picks, 2 first rounders, and Justin Fargas (a 3rd string RB) is your "best player?"What are your thoughts on the 03 draft?**CORRECTION**  After further review, SD is no longer in the bottom 5 and nearly makes the top 5 considering they drafted their "franchise" punter in the 5th, Kassim Osgood in the 7th and took Antonio Gates in Rookie Free Agency.  Gates changes the entire complexion of their draft.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 48 (members: 0, guests: 48)