Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Grade the Gute
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="elcid" data-source="post: 768709" data-attributes="member: 12360"><p>Randall/Kizer swap: C+</p><p>I really liked Randall's bounceback year and was kind of surprised to see the trade. However I'd rather would have had him the extra year due to our shaky CB situation right now. Kizer might be a talent so he can actually turn into a bargaining chip. Or Arod's successor, who knows. A hard one to grade, but since the Packers were evidently intend on moving on from Randall, this was the best way to do it while also retrieving picks and talent. </p><p></p><p>Graham signing and Jordy move: B-</p><p>I've downplayed my joy a bit after recent discussions on this forum but Im still confident this move gives Arod something he has always been missing since Finley.They most definitely paid more than a man at this stage of his career should command but thats what happens when he is the most sought commodity at his position this offseason. But I'd rather pay Graham 10M than I pay Jordy 10M at this point. Wish we could have offered Jordy some more money, but unfortunately the money just had to be spent on other positions.</p><p></p><p>Wilkerson deal: A</p><p>Whats left to say. Wish we could have had him for more years at that price.</p><p></p><p>Kyle Fuller offer: B+</p><p>He constructed a deal that would have been affordable for the Pack, yet also big enough for the Bears to take a significant part of their cap space. Im not sure any other team would have offered something similar so in this way the Bears just had to pay Fuller probably more then they had hoped. Considering he is being paid as a top 10 CB but has yet to show any of it, im fine with that. </p><p></p><p>Tramon Williams: C</p><p>Much needed, experienced and familiar CB depth. Just wish he would have cost us somewhat less considering he is 35. Will have to wait out for the rest of the details.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="elcid, post: 768709, member: 12360"] Randall/Kizer swap: C+ I really liked Randall's bounceback year and was kind of surprised to see the trade. However I'd rather would have had him the extra year due to our shaky CB situation right now. Kizer might be a talent so he can actually turn into a bargaining chip. Or Arod's successor, who knows. A hard one to grade, but since the Packers were evidently intend on moving on from Randall, this was the best way to do it while also retrieving picks and talent. Graham signing and Jordy move: B- I've downplayed my joy a bit after recent discussions on this forum but Im still confident this move gives Arod something he has always been missing since Finley.They most definitely paid more than a man at this stage of his career should command but thats what happens when he is the most sought commodity at his position this offseason. But I'd rather pay Graham 10M than I pay Jordy 10M at this point. Wish we could have offered Jordy some more money, but unfortunately the money just had to be spent on other positions. Wilkerson deal: A Whats left to say. Wish we could have had him for more years at that price. Kyle Fuller offer: B+ He constructed a deal that would have been affordable for the Pack, yet also big enough for the Bears to take a significant part of their cap space. Im not sure any other team would have offered something similar so in this way the Bears just had to pay Fuller probably more then they had hoped. Considering he is being paid as a top 10 CB but has yet to show any of it, im fine with that. Tramon Williams: C Much needed, experienced and familiar CB depth. Just wish he would have cost us somewhat less considering he is 35. Will have to wait out for the rest of the details. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Capitol 8805
Latest posts
Badgers Football 2025-2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 10:10 AM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
Movies and TV shows Thread
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 10:09 AM
Movies and Entertainment
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:48 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Cornelius Weems
Today at 9:25 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 6:50 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Grade the Gute
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
