Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Grade the Gute
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RRyder" data-source="post: 768685" data-attributes="member: 10329"><p>Graham- F</p><p></p><p>11 million for him is horrible. Can't block and only excels split out wide with a HoF QB throwing him the ball. Even if he puts up 700-800 yard and catches 8+ TDs people will be ecstatic because "wow. Look at those numbers for a TE" While neglecting the fact he's not actually a TE. He's just a big WR.</p><p></p><p>Wilkerson- A+</p><p></p><p>Low risk high reward. Not a whole lot not to like</p><p></p><p>Williams- C+</p><p></p><p>This is kind of a hard one to figure out. We needed a CB so this was a predictable move and if we get Arizona Tramon, even just for a year, this gets moved to an "A". But if we're relying on him to start and end up getting Cleveland Tramon, the last time he played under Pettine, then this turns into an D- or an F. As is I'm splitting the difference</p><p></p><p>Randall Trade- D (and I believe I'm being very generous with that D)</p><p></p><p>Im not the biggest Randall fan but at least he bounced back a little bit last year and showed to at least be a solid CB. By far our weakest position on the team and even though he was a headed trading him not only made it a necessity to pick up at least one vet CB and use at least one high draft pick on one. That's a hell of a domino effect to bring in the only QB worse then Hundley last year who only consistent trait was consistently making the worst possible mistake at the worst possible time. We did move up on two rounds though so I can't make it an "F"</p><p></p><p>Fuller- D</p><p></p><p>Offering Fuller a contract that was almost guaranteed to be matched was an asinine move. All it did was waste their own time and tied up 18 million in cap space for 5 days. Only reason it's an "F" grade is because I suppose the Bears couldve pulled a Browns and ****** up the paper work to match</p><p></p><p>Overall (so far)- D+/C-</p><p></p><p>Better on the D line. Worse at Saftey. Wash curretly at CB compared to last year given Tramons age and a bad contract handed out to a overrated WR offense while moving up slightly in two of the mid rounds with a waste of time added on in RFA. I'm sure plenty of people love it because of how active he is but this hasn't been nearly as good of an off-season as some would make it seem</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RRyder, post: 768685, member: 10329"] Graham- F 11 million for him is horrible. Can't block and only excels split out wide with a HoF QB throwing him the ball. Even if he puts up 700-800 yard and catches 8+ TDs people will be ecstatic because "wow. Look at those numbers for a TE" While neglecting the fact he's not actually a TE. He's just a big WR. Wilkerson- A+ Low risk high reward. Not a whole lot not to like Williams- C+ This is kind of a hard one to figure out. We needed a CB so this was a predictable move and if we get Arizona Tramon, even just for a year, this gets moved to an "A". But if we're relying on him to start and end up getting Cleveland Tramon, the last time he played under Pettine, then this turns into an D- or an F. As is I'm splitting the difference Randall Trade- D (and I believe I'm being very generous with that D) Im not the biggest Randall fan but at least he bounced back a little bit last year and showed to at least be a solid CB. By far our weakest position on the team and even though he was a headed trading him not only made it a necessity to pick up at least one vet CB and use at least one high draft pick on one. That's a hell of a domino effect to bring in the only QB worse then Hundley last year who only consistent trait was consistently making the worst possible mistake at the worst possible time. We did move up on two rounds though so I can't make it an "F" Fuller- D Offering Fuller a contract that was almost guaranteed to be matched was an asinine move. All it did was waste their own time and tied up 18 million in cap space for 5 days. Only reason it's an "F" grade is because I suppose the Bears couldve pulled a Browns and ****** up the paper work to match Overall (so far)- D+/C- Better on the D line. Worse at Saftey. Wash curretly at CB compared to last year given Tramons age and a bad contract handed out to a overrated WR offense while moving up slightly in two of the mid rounds with a waste of time added on in RFA. I'm sure plenty of people love it because of how active he is but this hasn't been nearly as good of an off-season as some would make it seem [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Today at 3:03 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Cap Projections and changes
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 11:26 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Movies and TV shows Thread
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 11:24 PM
Movies and Entertainment
M
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Magooch
Yesterday at 3:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
M
2026 Draft Rd 6 #35 K Trey Smack Florida
Latest: mradtke66
Yesterday at 2:31 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Grade the Gute
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
