Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 1047188" data-attributes="member: 7261">Right, because Gary, LVN, and Enagbare, were so much better options to cover running backs.   <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/rolleyes.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll Eyes    :rolleyes:" data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /> I doubt the defensive game plan for games is "lets make sure to put an OLB on a receiving RB every snap.  Yes, there are times when things break down and a guy like Preston ends up having to cover a RB.  I'm not putting a lot of emphasis on an OLB's ability to drop back into coverage.  When did you see Gary, LVN or Enagbare drop back into coverage?Spot on.  It gets tiring reading "fans" misplaced/misguided negativity.  It also seems to consistently come from certain fans, especially after a single loss.</blockquote>

Total: 361 (members: 4, guests: 357)