Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 999641" data-attributes="member: 10086">and here I thought [USER=16827]@Schultz[/USER] was unable to speak and being knocked off his high horse (See Saul from Tarsus) for his condescending nature throughout his post <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/whistling.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":whistling:" title="Whistling    :whistling:" data-shortname=":whistling:" />Let me help display someone else’s burden of proof that TB is or is not ultra hurtful.The 2022 Green Bay Packers KO TB was 22.5% (#32/32 NFL.Com)The Packers ST ranked #11/32 in allowed KO return coverage average at 23.2. The league averaged 22.85 per return (Rick Gosselin).Those results show conclusively that TB% does not correlate directly to success rates. As further proof, the Packers (23.2) were smack dab in the middle of Washington (23.3) and the Colts (23.0) in KO return yards allowed.Washington was #4/32 in TB%Indianapolis was #23/32 in TB%50% of the leagues allowed TD’s were with teams averaging TB% of 49%. The average TB% is 59.76. 2/6 TD’s were scored against teams who were ranking above average in TB% (Dolphins/Vikings)Mason was tied with 15 Kickers with 0% Out of bounds. 17 other Kickers shanked at least 1+ out of bounds Myth Busters results are in.Mason’s KO TB% consistently hurting the Packers (or any team) is largely fiction.</blockquote>

Total: 108 (members: 4, guests: 104)