Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1025862" data-attributes="member: 10086">Normally I’m totally backing Carlson because we obviously spent a 6th Rounder so we think enough of him to do that. In his corner, the difference between a decent Kicker and a poor Kicker is 2-3 missed FG and 2-3 missed XPA per season. Nobody has any idea if Carlson will make up that difference in 2024, however I think the odds are in your favor to gain some traction after another complete offseason and camp/preseason, plus gaining continuity with the same group.On the other side of the argument is this. We don’t have time to wait to train him. I mean that jokingly but respectfully. I believe GB has a good shot at getting back to a similar Divisional game scenario as early as in 12 months and we can’t be worried about kicking a 35-45 yarder.  I’d rather a guy that is $money$ inside 35, an easy top 10 Kicker inside 50 yards, can possibly squeak out a 51-54 yarder but just doesn’t possess the leg to hit past 55. I’ll take that problem as I know upfront I’ve got to get him inside the 40 yard line by a couple yards I’m ok with that n.p.i really want an “above average” % Kicker in both FG and XPM but Tom Brady under pressure. Which I hate to say it but that was Crosby. He was undeniably better in postseason. I’d put $500 on Crosby making that from 42 in the rain (and maybe more)</blockquote>

Total: 1,494 (members: 3, guests: 1,491)