Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1064334" data-attributes="member: 10086">I’d agree on one point we’re not better without JA. That said let’s look at changes since 2024.  Imo Nate Hobbs is a slight upgrade over Stokes. Stokes was a low end starter level CB. Almost became a place marker level until you find someone better. Also the losses in the DB room were primarily on Teams. Ballentine and Rochelle were Core Teams but not game changers by any means. They barely played on our Defense. So from a 2024 comparative view we lose Ja but he only started in 14 of the last 34+ postseason games. Meaning he didn’t finish them, so he really was out finishing 13 games in 2 seasons or 6.5 games per season. Listen. I love the kid he’s a heck of a ball player. Yet availability is the most imoortant aspect of playing a sport. If you’re not out there your impact is minimal over the bigger picture.</blockquote>

Total: 443 (members: 1, guests: 442)