Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Good Bye J’aire Alexander
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tynimiller" data-source="post: 1064327" data-attributes="member: 6578"><p>I wouldn't say poor, I would say no all pro present and valid to say unproven for sure. But poor...I just don't see it. </p><p></p><p>Last year some of our toughest matchups against passing attacks where we did well:</p><p></p><p><strong>Rams - Week 6</strong></p><p>No Jaire - Stafford went 15 of 26 for 224 yards with 2 TDs and 1 INT. Not a spectacular day but solid against a very good QB.</p><p></p><p>Now...to be fair that is it really (bet everyone thought this post was going to be only positive spin LOL). Many of our best games came against teams that had starting QB out or really the Seattle game is also a solid one as Geno didn't go down until late and our secondary had really limited Geno and that massively deadly passing game prior to him going down.</p><p></p><p>But Darnold...tore us up efficiently...Goff also even the game we held him to such a low number of yards didn't matter because efficiency was off the charts.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Now of course last year it was mainly Valentine and Nixon with Stokes next man up.....this year will be Valentine / Nixon and Hobbs most would assume as the main three. Arguably I think it is safe to assume that group is NOT going to be worse than it was last year. Hobbs versatility seems to fit Hafley's system very well...Valentine has become a better player constantly in his career and could be working towards a breakout...and Nixon...well I pray with all my might that I'm wrong that he never should be a starter. After those three though we got unproven King, Hadden and other late round flyers or such too....</p><p></p><p>Everyone knows I was a fan at this point of just eating the Jaire cost and taking him when he can play....but I also understand moving on. Now what I don't want is Gute to just ignore the market without some calls...call up Rasul Douglas and discuss numbers...even Gilmore....find out where they are and weigh the options. I think either at the right price would make a ton of sense and neither would IMO limit the growth of guys because as we all know MOST teams have three CBs that play a TON and a fourth that see the field a LOT.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tynimiller, post: 1064327, member: 6578"] I wouldn't say poor, I would say no all pro present and valid to say unproven for sure. But poor...I just don't see it. Last year some of our toughest matchups against passing attacks where we did well: [B]Rams - Week 6[/B] No Jaire - Stafford went 15 of 26 for 224 yards with 2 TDs and 1 INT. Not a spectacular day but solid against a very good QB. Now...to be fair that is it really (bet everyone thought this post was going to be only positive spin LOL). Many of our best games came against teams that had starting QB out or really the Seattle game is also a solid one as Geno didn't go down until late and our secondary had really limited Geno and that massively deadly passing game prior to him going down. But Darnold...tore us up efficiently...Goff also even the game we held him to such a low number of yards didn't matter because efficiency was off the charts. Now of course last year it was mainly Valentine and Nixon with Stokes next man up.....this year will be Valentine / Nixon and Hobbs most would assume as the main three. Arguably I think it is safe to assume that group is NOT going to be worse than it was last year. Hobbs versatility seems to fit Hafley's system very well...Valentine has become a better player constantly in his career and could be working towards a breakout...and Nixon...well I pray with all my might that I'm wrong that he never should be a starter. After those three though we got unproven King, Hadden and other late round flyers or such too.... Everyone knows I was a fan at this point of just eating the Jaire cost and taking him when he can play....but I also understand moving on. Now what I don't want is Gute to just ignore the market without some calls...call up Rasul Douglas and discuss numbers...even Gilmore....find out where they are and weigh the options. I think either at the right price would make a ton of sense and neither would IMO limit the growth of guys because as we all know MOST teams have three CBs that play a TON and a fourth that see the field a LOT. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: OldSchool101
33 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: OldSchool101
47 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Movies and TV shows Thread
Latest: Poppa San
Today at 11:57 AM
Movies and Entertainment
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: gopkrs
Today at 11:08 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Badgers Football 2025-2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:07 AM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Good Bye J’aire Alexander
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
