Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 1060058" data-attributes="member: 7261">Not at all, ya &*%)(#$_#_@!!!   <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/roflmao.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":roflmao:" title="ROFLMAO    :roflmao:" data-shortname=":roflmao:" />I am saying that IF, the Packers could work out a new contract with JA, even if they have to carry the potential $10.5M in game bonuses against the cap, that would be better than getting locked into his current base salaries of $16.5M (2025) and $18.5M in 2026 as counting against the cap.  Or am I missing something?Not to mention that if he got injured, they could cut him and not be locked into those base salaries.  I guess the NFL makes sure that you can't have your cake and eat it to.  I am fine with that.  I do believe that if he didn't play in 6 games, the $3M in possible game incentives that he wasn't given, could be excluded from the cap numbers for the next season.  I could be wrong on that, I will ask Russ Ball at Poker on Friday night.  <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/coffee.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":coffee:" title="Coffee    :coffee:" data-shortname=":coffee:" /></blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 127 (members: 0, guests: 127)