Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Gm rankings for draft
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 960930"><p>There are backup quarterbacks in the league capable of winning roughly half of their starts, allowing a team to stay in playoff contention even with the starter missing several games. Unfortunately I don't believe Love is one of them at this point in his career though.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I definitely agree with that statement, although there's no denying the early returns on Love aren't promising.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>In my opinion the Packers taking Love, a quarterback who they knew needed extra time to develop, actually makes the selection even worse. When was he supposed to get that opportunity while not even being active for his rookie campaign and then projected to backup Rodgers for the rest of his rookie deal???</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't understand that sentiment at all. The Packers should hold on to Love as long as they consider him the best option as a backup. They don't owe him an opportunity to compete for a starting job with another team by any means.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deleted member 6794, post: 960930"] There are backup quarterbacks in the league capable of winning roughly half of their starts, allowing a team to stay in playoff contention even with the starter missing several games. Unfortunately I don't believe Love is one of them at this point in his career though. I definitely agree with that statement, although there's no denying the early returns on Love aren't promising. In my opinion the Packers taking Love, a quarterback who they knew needed extra time to develop, actually makes the selection even worse. When was he supposed to get that opportunity while not even being active for his rookie campaign and then projected to backup Rodgers for the rest of his rookie deal??? I don't understand that sentiment at all. The Packers should hold on to Love as long as they consider him the best option as a backup. They don't owe him an opportunity to compete for a starting job with another team by any means. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Staff online
Poppa San
* Team Owner *
Members online
DoURant
Poppa San
Firethorn1001
Cornelius Weems
edensmage
Green_Bay_Packers
Latest posts
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: DoURant
7 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2024 Draft-- Media Stuff
Latest: Poppa San
17 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2024 1st Rd pick #25 Jorden Morgan OL
Latest: DoURant
22 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
C
I had This Nightmare
Latest: Calebs Revenge
55 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
F
Dark Horse Candidates
Latest: Firethorn1001
Today at 10:39 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Gm rankings for draft
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top