GB vs Minnesota schedule

longtimefan

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Mar 7, 2005
Messages
25,356
Reaction score
4,086
Location
Milwaukee
You blamed that on Favre the following day If i recall. .

okay noodle butt..

I am tired of your putting words in my mouth..

Unless you have proof I said he cost them the game then post the ****...I did put some blame on him just as it should be...Like blame on the o-l, for not doing their job..Everyone has a part in a loss...

But here are all the posts I found from that Vik Pitt game.


http://www.packerforum.com/packer-fan-forum/17607-pittsburg-vikings-2.html

on bretts official forum they are saying he had the flu that is why he played bad..Even are saying he played his heart out

what a bunch of crap

ummm yeah the ball got knocked out of his hands on that fumble..

but when its Rodgers its cuz he cant sens epressure

Bunch of effing hypocrites


http://www.packerforum.com/packer-fan-forum/17607-pittsburg-vikings-8.html


Ummmmm not the int, wasnt his fault...The fumble..

Clearly he didnt feel the pressure and that was 7 points he gave them.

you need to READ posts instead of skimming..

Just this week I told skol that Brett is having a MVP year


http://www.packerforum.com/packer-fan-forum/17607-pittsburg-vikings-9.html

Show me where I said I was at Lambeau? I know I said Iwas going to be at the Vik Pack game...

Show me where I claimed Rodgers was not to blame in the Viking game?

http://www.packerforum.com/packer-fan-forum/17607-pittsburg-vikings-10.html

I wish people wouldn't blame the int on Brett was not his fault

http://www.packerforum.com/packer-fan-forum/17607-pittsburg-vikings-11.html

Trust us we ALL would be in the Vikings spot as well

dont think us fans are declaring the Packer the division winners

But it helps that there is only one game separating the two teams and both play next week for a tie..

You also play the Cards, the Giants, and Cinncy... luck for you 2 of those are in the dome.

I think you should win those home games... The Giants game might not even matter cuz its last game of the season


So you may end up being 15-1..

http://www.packerforum.com/packer-fan-forum/17607-pittsburg-vikings-13.html

Though Peterson bowled over a guy and ran for like 30 yards ?

but yeah Brett did it all

yet when its a fumble for a TD it isnt his fault

:viksux::happy0005:

Originally Posted by Skol guy
You must be logged in to see this image or video!

2 years ago you guys would stand in line for hours to sniff his jock strap but now he sucks. You Packer backers crack me up

No, it is that he had a huge roll in the way they lost yet you refuse to acknowledge it

http://www.packerforum.com/packer-fan-forum/17607-pittsburg-vikings-16.html

riginally Posted by angryguy77
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
Saying that Favre cost them the game is pure ignorance. Taylor should have caught that ball palin and simple. By this logic I guess we can pipn every dropped ball for the packers on Rodgers.

Just unbelieveable how anyone with any sort of football knowlege would say ti Favre's fault.



I dont think to many people are claiming Brett was to blame for the int

But the fumble? That most defiantly can be put on him for not feleing the pressure..

I said same thing when it happened to him vs the Rams a few years ago in GB when they were going in for a score

The lineman should be blocking, but the q/b needs to feel the pressure


http://www.packerforum.com/packer-fan-forum/17607-pittsburg-vikings-17.html

You nailed it..Every player has a direct result in a win or loss..But some more than others..

And when a player has an "error" so to speak, it is magnified specially when it results in points for the other team.

Miracle passes? I do not buy into that OTHER then the Monday night game vs the Raiders..No way in hell those passes should have been completed..He threw ducks up and Walkers was coming down with them..

Brett should be trying to tackle a player that gets a fumble or an int if that player is going in for a score....I want my q/b to try his hardest to stop a defensive player from taking his ball to the endzone


But to block on a particular play or run down the field to block he shouldnt be..That is just my thoughts, not based on anything..
 

Skol guy

Cheesehead
Joined
Oct 6, 2009
Messages
766
Reaction score
1
okay noodle butt..

I am tired of your putting words in my mouth..

Unless you have proof I said he cost them the game then post the ****...

But here are all the posts I found from that Vik Pitt game.


http://www.packerforum.com/packer-fan-forum/17607-pittsburg-vikings-2.html




http://www.packerforum.com/packer-fan-forum/17607-pittsburg-vikings-8.html





http://www.packerforum.com/packer-fan-forum/17607-pittsburg-vikings-9.html



http://www.packerforum.com/packer-fan-forum/17607-pittsburg-vikings-10.html



http://www.packerforum.com/packer-fan-forum/17607-pittsburg-vikings-11.html



http://www.packerforum.com/packer-fan-forum/17607-pittsburg-vikings-13.html



Originally Posted by Skol guy
You must be logged in to see this image or video!

2 years ago you guys would stand in line for hours to sniff his jock strap but now he sucks. You Packer backers crack me up



http://www.packerforum.com/packer-fan-forum/17607-pittsburg-vikings-16.html

riginally Posted by angryguy77
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
Saying that Favre cost them the game is pure ignorance. Taylor should have caught that ball palin and simple. By this logic I guess we can pipn every dropped ball for the packers on Rodgers.

Just unbelieveable how anyone with any sort of football knowlege would say ti Favre's fault.






http://www.packerforum.com/packer-fan-forum/17607-pittsburg-vikings-17.html
No need for name calling. The mods are quite serious about that on this forum. I know as i had a Va-cay for the last month. what is noodle-butt anyway?:yahoo:
 

DILLIGAFF

Cheesehead
Joined
Aug 27, 2009
Messages
603
Reaction score
4
And this is why we play the games. Thank god this is not college football where the champs are decided by debates like this.

I want the Packers to go to the Super Bowl, but I would settle for beating the vikings in the playoffs or advancing further than them.

This year anybody has a shot at it, their are no dominating teams like the Patriots a couple of seasons ago.

As far as saying who has the lead or should be favored, vikings clearly because they beat us twice and have a better record. Both teams have taken advantage of an easy schedule. The Saints have had an easy schedule too. The Eagle, Dallas, and Giants are probably the most tested teams at this point, and I don't understand Arizona.

You can be a good team with an easy or hard schedule, but as the Giants proved that its not how you start or play in the regular season, but its how you finish.

The Packers without a doubt or finishing strong.
 

Skol guy

Cheesehead
Joined
Oct 6, 2009
Messages
766
Reaction score
1
And this is why we play the games. Thank god this is not college football where the champs are decided by debates like this.

I want the Packers to go to the Super Bowl, but I would settle for beating the vikings in the playoffs or advancing further than them.

This year anybody has a shot at it, their are no dominating teams like the Patriots a couple of seasons ago.
Agreed, the Vikings looked great the other day but looked terrible against the cards. I think 5 of the 6 playoff teams have the talent to win the NFC. Philly has looked great at times but gave up 500 yards to the giants and the cardinals are up and down and the saints are barely getting by so I think the packers could get hot and do some damage. Home-field advantage could be huge
 

PackersRS

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 22, 2008
Messages
8,450
Reaction score
969
Location
Porto Alegre, Brazil
Agreed, the Vikings looked great the other day but looked terrible against the cards. I think 5 of the 6 playoff teams have the talent to win the NFC. Philly has looked great at times but gave up 500 yards to the giants and the cardinals are up and down and the saints are barely getting by so I think the packers could get hot and do some damage. Home-field advantage could be huge
I think considering the youth of this team, home-field could be a huge factor. But you never know...
 
OP
OP
JeffQuery

JeffQuery

Banned
Banned
Joined
Jun 1, 2006
Messages
244
Reaction score
3
Yeah..against a bunch of "Tomato Can" Opponents...and Underachievers...

Big Deal...

What does that prove?

Nothing...
 

3irty1

Fear the Dreads!
Joined
Mar 12, 2009
Messages
895
Reaction score
115
Yeah Jeff, well The vikes are 0-0 when Favre is sacked 8 or more times in a game. TAKE THAT
 

Ted's Zombie Army

Cheesehead
Joined
Oct 4, 2009
Messages
263
Reaction score
4
I like kicking tomato cans and the ***** of underachievers as much as the next guy. It feels pretty much the same as a win against one of your troll-approved opponents and the league gives you the exact same number of wins as if you beat the world. That would be 1.

I'd ask TT if he rigged that schedule, but he's probably on the way to your house to try and stop Christmas. Bar that little troll door!
 

PackersRS

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 22, 2008
Messages
8,450
Reaction score
969
Location
Porto Alegre, Brazil
Okay, is this College football?? All this talk about schedulle, and what ifs...

Last time I checked, a W in the NFL is a W. There's no asteriscs, there's no rankings.
 

angryguy77

Cheesehead
Joined
Sep 16, 2008
Messages
382
Reaction score
2
Location
oshkosh
Okay, is this College football?? All this talk about schedulle, and what ifs...

Last time I checked, a W in the NFL is a W. There's no asteriscs, there's no rankings.

So a win against the lions or browns is just as impressive as a win against no, indi, minn or sd?

I think a win over a good team means and tells a little more about a club than a win over a not so good team.
 

Raptorman

Vikings fan since 1966.
Joined
Sep 1, 2006
Messages
3,168
Reaction score
438
Location
Vero Beach, FL
So a win against the lions or browns is just as impressive as a win against no, indi, minn or sd?

I think a win over a good team means and tells a little more about a club than a win over a not so good team.
So that would mean a loss to a bad team tells a little more about a club then a loss to a good team as well.
 

angryguy77

Cheesehead
Joined
Sep 16, 2008
Messages
382
Reaction score
2
Location
oshkosh
So that would mean a loss to a bad team tells a little more about a club then a loss to a good team as well.

Unless if you lose to good teams consistantly but beat the bad ones consistantly. Beating bad teams I dont believe gives anyone an idea about how good a team really is. Had minn lost to cinci I would say there would be questions about the team It's not that they dont have them, but I think we have a clearer picture as to what kind of team they are.
 

Skol guy

Cheesehead
Joined
Oct 6, 2009
Messages
766
Reaction score
1
I think considering the youth of this team, home-field could be a huge factor. But you never know...
Yeah well your 0-2 for the year with your predictions on this game so I am not sold Aaron rodgers is ready for Jared Allen in the dome come playoff time. The Vikings play like they did against Cincy and you have no chance
 

Skol guy

Cheesehead
Joined
Oct 6, 2009
Messages
766
Reaction score
1
I like kicking tomato cans and the ***** of underachievers as much as the next guy. It feels pretty much the same as a win against one of your troll-approved opponents and the league gives you the exact same number of wins as if you beat the world. That would be 1.

I'd ask TT if he rigged that schedule, but he's probably on the way to your house to try and stop Christmas. Bar that little troll door!
The schedule is set up by how the NFC north finished last year and since the packers had a bad year as well as the lions the north was given a weaker schedule. So to blame the Vikings and their weak schedule on luck is ludricous. It has nothing to do with their 10-6 finish but more to do with the Lions and Packers record.
 

PackersRS

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 22, 2008
Messages
8,450
Reaction score
969
Location
Porto Alegre, Brazil
So a win against the lions or browns is just as impressive as a win against no, indi, minn or sd?

I think a win over a good team means and tells a little more about a club than a win over a not so good team.
Tells a little bit more? Do you remember who we won from in 96? Yeah, that's what I thought... It means ****. All that matters is the W.

I'm not evaluating anybody, and nobody's concept in here matters. All I care is about my team reaching the playoffs, and winning. If we win from the Lions, and not the Eagles, we're not going to the Fiesta Bowl instead of the BCS Bowl... We're going to the playoffs either way.

And, as I've said before, you got to be kidding yourselves if you think a regular season games is the same as a playoff game, and that the winning record and who we've beaten matters when we play the opponent on the wildcard.
Yeah well your 0-2 for the year with your predictions on this game so I am not sold Aaron rodgers is ready for Jared Allen in the dome come playoff time. The Vikings play like they did against Cincy and you have no chance
I was talking about GB being away for the whole playoffs. Not about GB and MN. Believe it or not, but GB doesn't play MN every week. First, we need to win the first round. Then maybe we can play and see that. As I've said before, I don't care about Division Titles. I have no idea how many of those we got. I have no idea of how many Conference championships we have. All I know is that we got 12 Titles, being 3 of those SBs.
-
If you all want to continue measuring your penises, that's fine with me...
 

Skol guy

Cheesehead
Joined
Oct 6, 2009
Messages
766
Reaction score
1
So that would mean a loss to a bad team tells a little more about a club then a loss to a good team as well.
gd. point because Minnesota 2 losses are against last years superbowl teams and one of the packers losses came at the hands of the bucs. Your other out of conference loss is to a team that the vikings destroyed by twenty so really the arguement about how lucky and schedule makes no sense.
 

Skol guy

Cheesehead
Joined
Oct 6, 2009
Messages
766
Reaction score
1
I am not counting the packers out because all the playoff teams will be capable of pulling off any game and yes luck does have alot to do with the way the ball bounces so put that talk to bed. I would bet the packers have had acouple breaks that we deemed lucky on this side of the river over the years. Sometimes the football gods give gifts
 

Raptorman

Vikings fan since 1966.
Joined
Sep 1, 2006
Messages
3,168
Reaction score
438
Location
Vero Beach, FL
Tells a little bit more? Do you remember who we won from in 96? Yeah, that's what I thought... It means ****. All that matters is the W.

I'm not evaluating anybody, and nobody's concept in here matters. All I care is about my team reaching the playoffs, and winning. If we win from the Lions, and not the Eagles, we're not going to the Fiesta Bowl instead of the BCS Bowl... We're going to the playoffs either way.

And, as I've said before, you got to be kidding yourselves if you think a regular season games is the same as a playoff game, and that the winning record and who we've beaten matters when we play the opponent on the wildcard.

I was talking about GB being away for the whole playoffs. Not about GB and MN. Believe it or not, but GB doesn't play MN every week. First, we need to win the first round. Then maybe we can play and see that. As I've said before, I don't care about Division Titles. I have no idea how many of those we got. I have no idea of how many Conference championships we have. All I know is that we got 12 Titles, being 3 of those SBs.
-
If you all want to continue measuring your penises, that's fine with me...
In the true historical aspect they have 14. But that's for another thread and time.
 

Skol guy

Cheesehead
Joined
Oct 6, 2009
Messages
766
Reaction score
1
Tells a little bit more? Do you remember who we won from in 96? Yeah, that's what I thought... It means ****. All that matters is the W.

I'm not evaluating anybody, and nobody's concept in here matters. All I care is about my team reaching the playoffs, and winning. If we win from the Lions, and not the Eagles, we're not going to the Fiesta Bowl instead of the BCS Bowl... We're going to the playoffs either way.

And, as I've said before, you got to be kidding yourselves if you think a regular season games is the same as a playoff game, and that the winning record and who we've beaten matters when we play the opponent on the wildcard.

I was talking about GB being away for the whole playoffs. Not about GB and MN. Believe it or not, but GB doesn't play MN every week. First, we need to win the first round. Then maybe we can play and see that. As I've said before, I don't care about Division Titles. I have no idea how many of those we got. I have no idea of how many Conference championships we have. All I know is that we got 12 Titles, being 3 of those SBs.
-
If you all want to continue measuring your penises, that's fine with me...
History 101 huh? freshen it up abit as we have heard that over and over from you. You live in the past as the defending NFC North Champions are getting ready to claim another div. championship. I can't wait for baseball season so I can brag about the 87' & 91' world series champion Minnesota twins to combat your 96' superbowl team talk that we are all quite aware of. We get it back in the day before you were born the packers won some champioships when there was about half of the teams there is now and your proud as a peacock. Boy do the Minneapolis Lakers make me damn proud to be from the land of lakes!
 

angryguy77

Cheesehead
Joined
Sep 16, 2008
Messages
382
Reaction score
2
Location
oshkosh
Tells a little bit more? Do you remember who we won from in 96? Yeah, that's what I thought... It means ****. All that matters is the W.

I'm not evaluating anybody, and nobody's concept in here matters. All I care is about my team reaching the playoffs, and winning. If we win from the Lions, and not the Eagles, we're not going to the Fiesta Bowl instead of the BCS Bowl... We're going to the playoffs either way.

And, as I've said before, you got to be kidding yourselves if you think a regular season games is the same as a playoff game, and that the winning record and who we've beaten matters when we play the opponent on the wildcard.

I was talking about GB being away for the whole playoffs. Not about GB and MN. Believe it or not, but GB doesn't play MN every week. First, we need to win the first round. Then maybe we can play and see that. As I've said before, I don't care about Division Titles. I have no idea how many of those we got. I have no idea of how many Conference championships we have. All I know is that we got 12 Titles, being 3 of those SBs.
-
If you all want to continue measuring your penises, that's fine with me...

What I do remember from that 96 team is as the year progressed there wasn't doubt about how good the team was as they beat down most opponents. That I do remember. What I dont remember is them beating worthless teams and trying to make a case that there wins are just as impressive as beating a good team-unlike this year.

A win is a win, i get that. But if any of you can say that this team is much better than it was judging on who they have played so far, then you must all be high.
 

PackersRS

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 22, 2008
Messages
8,450
Reaction score
969
Location
Porto Alegre, Brazil
History 101 huh? freshen it up abit as we have heard that over and over from you. You live in the past as the defending NFC North Champions are getting ready to claim another div. championship. I can't wait for baseball season so I can brag about the 87' & 91' world series champion Minnesota twins to combat your 96' superbowl team talk that we are all quite aware of. We get it back in the day before you were born the packers won some champioships when there was about half of the teams there is now and your proud as a peacock. Boy do the Minneapolis Lakers make me damn proud to be from the land of lakes!
As far as I'm concerned, those 2 Vikings games are also History... We're playing very differently than we were, we have different players playing...
 

Members online

Latest posts

Top