Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
GB @ DALLAS Sunday Night Showdown
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 1072298" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>Yeah. I just think sometimes we’re going in to a contest while living in a glass house. It just takes a drop and things get messy. Get it behind you.</p><p></p><p>I’d be more concerned had we lost by 2-scores. Great Football Teams get beat in OT or a walk off type situations all the time. That’s why you gotta play to win for 60 minutes.</p><p></p><p>That said, When I look at that last INT that Love threw, Wicks tangled with a Defender at about the 4+ yard mark and that contact appeared to take him like 2-3 yards deeper than the ball was thrown. In doing so he lost his inside position. That was an anticipated throw. Now Love will take the blame there and that’s admirable. QB’s (other than Aaron Rodgers) mostly take the blame.</p><p>Love takes all the heat, but Wicks has to understand where the marker is and the angle to get to the marker as quickly as possible. I don’t need 7 yards I don’t need 17 yards and I don’t need 37 yards. I need 3.5 yards here. No play design against that team would’ve been a 7 yard throw and I’m near positive on that.</p><p></p><p> That’s Love INT is the 1 scenario where a 1st down is Equivalent of several points and there’s really no reason to risk throwing a 7 yard mark, 11 yard or 14 yard throw. In that situation 3 yards has the exact same impact.</p><p></p><p>Moving the Clock is equivalent of</p><p>points and the shorter the route the higher the conversion rate. Conversely, The longer the play develops the greater chance for error and particularly for any HC that watched 4 Qtrs of Love being assaulted. You needed a bang bang quick 3.5 yards and not an inch more. I have no idea why Wicks is just getting his head around at 6+ looking for a 7+ play. Totally unnecessary.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]21716[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 1072298, member: 10086"] Yeah. I just think sometimes we’re going in to a contest while living in a glass house. It just takes a drop and things get messy. Get it behind you. I’d be more concerned had we lost by 2-scores. Great Football Teams get beat in OT or a walk off type situations all the time. That’s why you gotta play to win for 60 minutes. That said, When I look at that last INT that Love threw, Wicks tangled with a Defender at about the 4+ yard mark and that contact appeared to take him like 2-3 yards deeper than the ball was thrown. In doing so he lost his inside position. That was an anticipated throw. Now Love will take the blame there and that’s admirable. QB’s (other than Aaron Rodgers) mostly take the blame. Love takes all the heat, but Wicks has to understand where the marker is and the angle to get to the marker as quickly as possible. I don’t need 7 yards I don’t need 17 yards and I don’t need 37 yards. I need 3.5 yards here. No play design against that team would’ve been a 7 yard throw and I’m near positive on that. That’s Love INT is the 1 scenario where a 1st down is Equivalent of several points and there’s really no reason to risk throwing a 7 yard mark, 11 yard or 14 yard throw. In that situation 3 yards has the exact same impact. Moving the Clock is equivalent of points and the shorter the route the higher the conversion rate. Conversely, The longer the play develops the greater chance for error and particularly for any HC that watched 4 Qtrs of Love being assaulted. You needed a bang bang quick 3.5 yards and not an inch more. I have no idea why Wicks is just getting his head around at 6+ looking for a 7+ play. Totally unnecessary. [ATTACH type="full" alt="IMG_2528.jpeg"]21716[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
tynimiller
Magooch
Latest posts
Movies and TV shows Thread
Latest: Voyageur
11 minutes ago
Movies and Entertainment
Badgers Football 2025-2026
Latest: Voyageur
18 minutes ago
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 12:29 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: CarryTheG14
Today at 11:42 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:48 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
GB @ DALLAS Sunday Night Showdown
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
