Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Gary 3.0
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 870073" data-attributes="member: 12283"><p>Globally, my only disappointment in a haul like this would just be not adding a linebacker earlier. I don't think they need one in the top 2 rounds at all costs (though it should be in play at #62), but in the 6th round there's a real chance that the player doesn't even make the roster. So you'd really just be relying on what's in house and maybe what's added via roster cuts. </p><p></p><p>Specifically, your taste in prospects is obviously immaculate. </p><p></p><p>To the point about needing a corner, the current depth charter at cornerback and wide receiver is really not all that different.</p><p></p><p>You have great players at the top in Alexander and Adams respectively.</p><p></p><p>After that, you could say that cornerback is in a little bit better shape as King is more of an established starter than either Lazard or Funchess. However, he's still a pretty average starter, <em>and </em>he's not reliable in terms of availability, so I don't think there's a huge gap there.</p><p></p><p>And after that it's just a lot of unproven guys: Sullivan, Jackson, Hollman on the one hand and Valdes-Scantling, St. Brown, and Kumerow on the other. </p><p></p><p>And then you have to consider that there is a cluster of good, talented, man skilled corners with size that will be in play at #30 or via a trade down, but the pool dries up thereafter. I'm talking about Jaylon Johnson, A.J. Terrell, Kristian Fulton, Jeff Gladney, Trevon Diggs, and Damon Arnette. It's possible that one of them could make it to #62, but unlikely, in my opinion. </p><p></p><p>After them, there are a lot of really good slot corner prospects, and some good zone corner prospects, and some interesting projects, but the good man prospects are fewer and farther between (Noah Igbinoghene and Troy Pride, and ?). </p><p></p><p>Receive, on the other hand, is going to carry value to #62 pretty reliably.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dantés, post: 870073, member: 12283"] Globally, my only disappointment in a haul like this would just be not adding a linebacker earlier. I don't think they need one in the top 2 rounds at all costs (though it should be in play at #62), but in the 6th round there's a real chance that the player doesn't even make the roster. So you'd really just be relying on what's in house and maybe what's added via roster cuts. Specifically, your taste in prospects is obviously immaculate. To the point about needing a corner, the current depth charter at cornerback and wide receiver is really not all that different. You have great players at the top in Alexander and Adams respectively. After that, you could say that cornerback is in a little bit better shape as King is more of an established starter than either Lazard or Funchess. However, he's still a pretty average starter, [I]and [/I]he's not reliable in terms of availability, so I don't think there's a huge gap there. And after that it's just a lot of unproven guys: Sullivan, Jackson, Hollman on the one hand and Valdes-Scantling, St. Brown, and Kumerow on the other. And then you have to consider that there is a cluster of good, talented, man skilled corners with size that will be in play at #30 or via a trade down, but the pool dries up thereafter. I'm talking about Jaylon Johnson, A.J. Terrell, Kristian Fulton, Jeff Gladney, Trevon Diggs, and Damon Arnette. It's possible that one of them could make it to #62, but unlikely, in my opinion. After them, there are a lot of really good slot corner prospects, and some good zone corner prospects, and some interesting projects, but the good man prospects are fewer and farther between (Noah Igbinoghene and Troy Pride, and ?). Receive, on the other hand, is going to carry value to #62 pretty reliably. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
rmontro
Latest posts
Badger buckets 2023-2024
Latest: Voyageur
50 minutes ago
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
2024 Clusters
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 11:56 PM
Draft Talk
S
Let’s have a serious conversation…aka ditch Anders
Latest: Schultz
Yesterday at 9:59 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Lady Hockey Badgers!
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 9:42 PM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
2024 schedule
Latest: lambeaulambo
Yesterday at 9:40 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Gary 3.0
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top