Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="TJV" data-source="post: 495695" data-attributes="member: 4300">I think the money for Jennings would have come from waiving Finley, so it was either/or regarding Finley and Jennings, not both. I don't think they wanted to lose two targets for Rodgers. I believe Wilde and another beat writer confirmed that with a source within the organization (not that that proves it). The Brad Jones extension was more puzzling to me. There are a lot of bodies at ILB and now they're paying three of them starter's money. An either/or with Jones and Hawk would have made more sense to me but maybe Jones' extension says more about the likelihood of Bishop's recovery than I/we would like to believe? </blockquote>

Total: 687 (members: 2, guests: 685)