Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Free Agency
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TJV" data-source="post: 495695" data-attributes="member: 4300"><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"><span style="color: #000000">I think the money for Jennings would have come from waiving Finley, so it was either/or regarding Finley and Jennings, not both. I don't think they wanted to lose two targets for Rodgers. I believe Wilde and another beat writer confirmed that with a source within the organization (not that that proves it). The Brad Jones extension was more puzzling to me. There are a lot of bodies at ILB and now they're paying three of them starter's money. An either/or with Jones and Hawk would have made more sense to me but maybe Jones' extension says more about the likelihood of Bishop's recovery than I/we would like to believe? </span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TJV, post: 495695, member: 4300"] [FONT=Arial][COLOR=#000000]I think the money for Jennings would have come from waiving Finley, so it was either/or regarding Finley and Jennings, not both. I don't think they wanted to lose two targets for Rodgers. I believe Wilde and another beat writer confirmed that with a source within the organization (not that that proves it). The Brad Jones extension was more puzzling to me. There are a lot of bodies at ILB and now they're paying three of them starter's money. An either/or with Jones and Hawk would have made more sense to me but maybe Jones' extension says more about the likelihood of Bishop's recovery than I/we would like to believe? [/COLOR][/FONT] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Staff online
PikeBadger
Moderator
Members online
swhitset
Todd Princl
weeds
scheeler
PikeBadger
gopkrs
Packermudgeon
Heyjoe4
XPack
Latest posts
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: weeds
9 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: AmishMafia
9 minutes ago
Draft Talk
H
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: Heyjoe4
12 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: AmishMafia
22 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
I had This Nightmare
Latest: Poppa San
Yesterday at 10:58 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Free Agency
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top